A Tale of Two Representations: Energy and Time in Photoabsorption

arXiv:2103.14985 · quant-ph, physics.atom-ph · Submitted 2021-03-27 · Read on arXiv

Listen

Radio episode about this paper

Transcript

Introduction to the show: ident: Quantum Radio. Generated commentary on the latest quantum physics and condensed matter papers.

Kai: We're looking at the paper: "A Tale of Two Representations".

Mira: Here's the gist of the paper. The gist The essay discusses two alternative representations of energy and time, a time-dependent and a time-independent one, both capable of embracing the same physics.

Kai: Conjugate Pairs and State Definition Quantum physics introduces pairs of conjugate quantities bearing a specific complementary relationship, energy and time being one such pair.

Mira: These pairs can be seen as gradients with respect to one another, with Planck’s characterizing our Universe.

Kai: In quantum mechanics, the state of a system cannot simultaneously be prescribed in terms of both members of the conjugate pair because sets a limitation on such simultaneous prescription of entities whose commutator is non-zero.

Paper summary: Kai: So, to recap, the paper "A Tale of Two Representations: Energy and Time in Photoabsorption" argues that energy and time are linked by a complementary relationship in quantum physics, leading to two ways of looking at a system.

Mira: The core thesis is that these two representations—the time-dependent one versus the time-independent one—can both accurately describe the same underlying physics.

Lev: It seems like they're saying that depending on whether you're studying bound states or scattering, you get a different kind of description.

Kai: Exactly. For bound states, time is often background noise because the electron persists forever, so a time-independent view works pretty well there.

Mira: But for scattering and collisions, which involve an electron leaving the system to go somewhere else, you really need to use a representation that evolves with time.

Lev: The paper connects this to how we calculate the S-matrix through phase shifts delta, which are functions of energy E.

Kai: And it uses the ratio of these phase shifts—exp(2i delta)—to get the scattering cross section sigma, which is related to exp(-iE) times some factor involving sin delta <ref:2103.14985#pg2>.

Mira: The paper also introduces the time delay tau equal to two times the derivative of that phase shift with respect to energy, ddelta over dE, as a measure of how long something gets trapped.

Lev: That trapping interpretation is interesting because it suggests a temporary configuration before the electron re-enters the continuum.

Kai: It also covers angular momentum barriers and shape resonances, which are caused by an effective potential that keeps the electron away from the origin.

Mira: These shape resonances are distinct because they arise from the geometry of that potential, not just being trapped in a simple bound state configuration.

Lev: When you look at running this on real hardware, like superconducting qubits or whatever we're working on, you have to figure out how much overhead those time-dependent calculations actually add.

Kai: That’s the engineering reality—figuring out which representation is more convenient and practical for the specific experimental setup we are trying to achieve.

Conclusion: Mira: So, looking at "A Tale of Two Representations: Energy and Time in Photoabsorption," it really boils down to how energy and time descriptions work together.

Kai: The authors show that these two seemingly different descriptions give you complementary insights into photoabsorption phenomena like Cooper minima or angular momentum barrier tunneling.

Mira: They establish that both the time-dependent and time-independent views are valid, but their utility depends entirely on the specific technical questions you're trying to answer in your research.

Lev: For us, it means that when we design quantum error correction schemes or look at pulse sequences, we have to be conscious of whether our model relies more on a time-dependent evolution or a static energy picture.

Kai: Ultimately, the paper is about showing that the choice isn't just academic; it dictates which tools you use for analyzing these complex atomic physics problems.

Mira: It highlights how long-standing concepts in atomic physics are being approached with new tools from experimental capabilities over the past fifty years.

A. R. P. Rau

Louisiana State University

quant-ph, physics.atom-ph

Submitted: 2021-03-27

Updated: 2021-03-27

Comments: 8 pages

Journal ref: Phys. Scr. 96, 094019 (2021)

DOI: 10.1088/1402-4896/ac0aa1

License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/

Importance score: 74/100

The gist: The gist The essay discusses two alternative representations of energy and time, a time-dependent and a time-independent one, both capable of embracing the same physics.

Key concepts

Conjugate Pairs
In quantum physics, energy and time are conjugate pairs with a specific complementary relationship. Because of this relationship, a system's state cannot be perfectly described by both simultaneously; one must be chosen over the other to define the physical state.
Phase Shifts
Spectroscopy involves analyzing how electrons interact with atoms. The electron's wave function is analyzed using phase shifts ($\delta$), which depend on energy. These shifts contain all information about the interactions between the electron and its environment, determining the scattering cross-section.
Time Delay ($ au$)
The time delay ($ au = 2\hbar d\delta/dE$) measures how long an electron remains temporarily trapped in a specific configuration before emerging back into the continuum. It is calculated from the energy dependence of phase shifts and reflects residual energy dependencies beyond the first derivative.
Shape Resonances
These resonances occur when an electron experiences a potential barrier that creates a 'two-valley' structure, resulting in a deep inner well and a shallow outer well. These shape resonances arise from the geometry of the potential rather than just being quasi-bound states.

Terminology

Summary

The gist The essay discusses two alternative representations of energy and time, a time-dependent and a time-independent one, both capable of embracing the same physics.

Conjugate Pairs and State Definition

Quantum physics introduces pairs of conjugate quantities bearing a specific complementary relationship, energy and time being one such pair. These pairs can be seen as gradients with respect to one another, with Planck’s characterizing our Universe. In quantum mechanics, the state of a system cannot simultaneously be prescribed in terms of both members of the conjugate pair because sets a limitation on such simultaneous prescription of entities whose commutator is non-zero. Only mutually commuting entities can be fixed simultaneously and used to define physical states, which points to choosing either one but not both of a non-commuting pair.

Bound States vs. Scattering Dynamics

The text contrasts the view of bound states in t-independent terms with collisions or scattering handled as evolving in time. Stationary states of fixed energy played a central role in the development of quantum physics, and Bohr’s description accounted for both atomic sizes and energies. In such a state, time becomes irrelevant as the electron persists over all time, occurring as a background in a generally ignorable pure phase factor of the wave function. Conversely, collisions or scattering are handled another way as evolving in time.

Phase Shifts and Cross Sections

Spectroscopy, involving bound states and transitions, is best viewed on the same footing as scattering involving asymptotic states with the electron reaching infinity. The electron’s asymptotic wave function is given by a superposition of regular and irregular solutions, leading to phase shifts δ that are functions of E. These phase shifts contain all effects of interactions, and the scattering cross-section is determined by the S-matrix ratio exp(2iδ).

Resonances and Time Delay

A rapid climb through π over some energy interval Γ around Er denotes a “resonance” of width Γ at that energy Er, where time may be invoked through /Γ as a “lifetime” of a state at that energy. The Wigner-Eisenbud-Smith “time delay” τ = 2 dδ/dE is introduced to analyze the energy dependence of phase shifts, reflecting residual energy dependences beyond the first derivative. This time delay can be interpreted as a temporary trapping into that configuration before the electron again emerges back in the continuum.

Angular Momentum Barriers and Shape Resonances

The angular momentum barrier experienced by the electron is related to Wigner threshold laws, which involve an effective potential that keeps the electron away from the origin. In complex atoms, this barrier can lead to a “two-valley” potential with an inner deep attractive well and a shallow outer well separated by an intervening positive barrier. This structure can result in “shape” resonances, which lie above threshold (E > 0) and arise from the shape of the potential.

Technological Influence

The choice of representation is influenced by what is technologically convenient or indeed possible, as direct measurements of short times were outside the reach of experiment in the first decades. The advent of very short laser pulses and streak cameras has only recently permitted such direct access to the very short times involved.

Acknowledgments

The perspectives one develops of a field owe much to several discussions with colleagues over many years. The author notes that this article in honor of his contributions to the field is also offered as a tribute to others with whom he discussed from those first months and extending over decades but who have now, sadly, passed away.

The paper explores the complementary nature of energy and time representations in quantum physics, highlighting how these two seemingly different descriptions provide distinct yet unified insights into phenomena like photoabsorption. The discussion delves into the relationship between bound states and scattering processes, utilizing phase shifts to characterize interactions, resonances defined by energy structure, and the introduction of time delay as a measure of state evolution. Furthermore, the paper connects these concepts to physical barriers like angular momentum barriers and illustrates how technological advancements have enabled direct measurement of short timescales relevant to these quantum dynamics. The core argument is that both representations are valid tools for understanding atomic physics, with the choice between them depending on the specific technical or experimental context.

How it works

The paper contrasts two primary ways of describing physical systems: a time-dependent and a time-independent one. In the context of quantum states, the state cannot be prescribed in terms of both members of the conjugate pair because ~ sets a limitation on such simultaneous prescription. This necessitates choosing either energy or time, but not both, for a non-commuting pair.

The analysis of scattering involves constructing the full wave function by superposing different solutions of the radial equation with appropriate outgoing (+) or ingoing (-) wave boundary conditions. The ratio of coefficients exp(±iδ), namely exp(2iδ), is identified as the S-matrix, and its modulus-square yields the scattering cross-section.

Resonances are characterized by a rapid climb through π over some energy interval Γ around Er, which can be interpreted as a quasi-bound state embedded in a continuum. The resonance cross section is described by the Beutler-Fano profile, which is asymmetric about Er and reduces to a symmetric Breit-Wigner form for large q.

The time delay τ = 2 dδ/dE provides an energy-dependent measure of the phase shift, reflecting residual energy dependences beyond the first derivative. This time delay can be interpreted as a temporary trapping into a configuration before the electron emerges back in the continuum.

Angular momentum barriers are related to an effective potential that keeps the electron away from the origin, which involves a k2 + 1 dependence in the phase shift that forms the basis of Wigner threshold laws. These barriers can lead to “shape” resonances, distinguishing them from quasi-bound state or “Feshbach” resonances.

The paper emphasizes that the choice of representation is often dictated by technological feasibility, as direct measurements of short times were previously impossible until the advent of attosecond measurement technology. The integration of time-dependent Schrödinger equation with very small time steps via supercomputers allows for meaningful direct integration without being restricted to time-independent calculations.

The concepts discussed, such as the Wigner threshold laws and the interpretation of resonances, are grounded in established spectroscopic techniques and theoretical models derived from decades of research in atomic physics. The paper concludes by noting that alternative descriptions exist outside physics, such as those used in astronomy and biology to manage vastly different time scales.

The study is grounded in established spectroscopic techniques and theoretical models derived from decades of research in atomic physics. The paper concludes by noting that alternative descriptions exist outside physics, such as those used in astronomy and biology to manage vastly different time scales. This comprehensive analysis underscores the deep interplay between fundamental quantum concepts and the practical constraints imposed by experimental capabilities.

The study is grounded in established spectroscopic techniques and theoretical models derived from decades of research in atomic physics.

Improvements for AI systems

  1. textbf Rewriting Time-Dependent Simulations for Scattering Events: The Time Delay Metric. This allows AI models to predict not just energy-dependent cross sections, but also incorporate a time delay, defined as τ = 2 dδ/dE (Eq. 6), providing a measure of the temporary trapping into that configuration mentioned in the text when analyzing resonances like Cooper minima.

  2. textbf Developing Fano Resonance Prediction via Time Domain Analysis. AI systems can be trained to analyze the time domain following a resonance, using measurements that probe the phase of the photoionization amplitude with free electron lasers, as this allows probing Fano resonances in the time domain, following their very build up [41–44] in time.

  3. textbf Implementing Angular Momentum Barrier Modeling via Effective Potentials. AI can utilize the concept of a two-valley potential described as an inner deep attractive well and a shallow outer well separated by an intervening positive barrier, which is crucial for understanding how the angular momentum barrier suppresses electron escape in complex atoms.

  4. textbf Enhancing Photoionization Prediction with Shape Resonance Identification. Models can be improved to distinguish between different resonance types by analyzing the energy dependence of cross sections, specifically identifying shape resonances (section 4.5 of [11]) to distinguish them from quasi-bound state or 'Feshbach' resonances discussed earlier [33, 34].

  5. textbf Creating High-Resolution Spectral Analysis via Energy Derivative Mapping. AI can leverage the mapping provided by the decomposition in Eq. (4) to map energy values from smaller than Er to larger into a variation of δb from 0 to π as the cotangent goes from −∞ to ∞, enabling precise identification of resonance widths Γ and lifetimes.

Abstract

This essay is based on a talk at Advances in Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Sciences 2020 (AAMOS20) in a symposium honoring Prof. S. T. Manson's decades-long contribution to photoabsorption studies. Quantum physics introduced into physics pairs of conjugate quantities bearing a specific complementary relationship, energy and time being one such pair. This gives rise to two alternative representations, a time-dependent and a time-independent one, seemingly very different but both capable of embracing the same physics. They give complementary descriptions and insight, with technical questions, theoretical and experimental, determining which may be the more convenient and practicable at any juncture. Two recent topics, Cooper minima in photoabsorption in Cl- and Ar, and angular-momentum barrier tunneling of f photoelectrons from Se in WSe 2, provide illustrative examples, also of the role that technological developments over the past five decades played in our approach to and understanding of phenomena.

Related papers