A quantum annealing approach to the minimum distance problem of quantum codes
quant-ph, cond-mat.stat-mech
Submitted: 2024-04-26
Updated: 2026-10-14
Journal ref: Phys. Rev. A 114, 042610 (2026)
DOI: 10.1103/573l-6cc2
Code: https://github.com/RefatIsmail96/QUBO-for-Self-dual-Stabilizer-codes
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: Quantum error-correcting codes (QECCs) are at the heart of fault-tolerant quantum computing.
Terminology
Abstract
Quantum error-correcting codes (QECCs) are at the heart of fault-tolerant quantum computing. As the size of quantum platforms is expected to grow, one of the open questions is to design new optimal codes of ever-increasing size. A related challenge is to certify the quality of a given code by evaluating its minimum distance, a quantity characterizing code's capacity to preserve quantum information. This problem is known to be NP-hard. Here we propose to harness the power of contemporary quantum platforms to address this question, and in this way help design quantum platforms of the future. Namely, we introduce an approach to compute the minimum distance of quantum stabilizer codes by reformulating the problem as a Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) problem and leveraging established QUBO algorithms and heuristics as well as quantum annealing (QA) to address the latter. The reformulation as a QUBO introduces only a logarithmic multiplicative overhead in the required number of variables. We demonstrate the formulation using the D-Wave Advantage 4.1 quantum annealer and the hybrid quantum-classical algorithm Qbsolv, and benchmark the resulting QUBO-based implementations against specialized classical distance-finding methods. The QA- and SA-assisted implementations show broadly comparable performance, while the classical comparison clarifies the relative strengths of heuristic optimization and exact distance certification. Our results establish a solver-independent QUBO formulation with only a logarithmic multiplicative overhead in the number of variables and characterize connectivity and minor embedding as central limitations of its present implementation on quantum-annealing hardware.
Sources
- Stabilizer Codes and Quantum Error Correction
- On the Hardness of the Minimum Distance Problem of Quantum Codes
- Numerical Techniques for Finding the Distances of Quantum Codes
- Distance verification for classical and quantum LDPC codes
- A Tutorial on Formulating and Using QUBO Models
- Quantum Error Correction via Codes over GF(4)
Related papers
- Reconquering Bell sampling on qudits: stabilizer learning and testing, quantum pseudorandomness bounds, and more
- Encrypted clones can leak: Classification of informative subsets in Quantum Encrypted Cloning
- Polynomial-time classical and quantum simulation of quantum impurity models
- Incoherent Imaging with Spatially Structured Quantum Probes
- A quasiparticle-protected superconducting qubit
- Theory of quantum-enhanced interferometry with general Markovian light sources