How to Teach Large Multimodal Models New Skills
cs.AI, cs.CV, cs.LG
Submitted: 2025-10-09
Updated: 2026-10-22
Comments: ECCV 2026 Spotlight. Code is available at https://github.com/jessemelpolio/LMM_CL
Code: https://github.com/jessemelpolio/LMM_CL
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: How can we teach large multimodal models (LMMs) new skills without erasing prior abilities? We study sequential fine-tuning on five target skills while monitoring general ability on eight held-out
Terminology
Abstract
How can we teach large multimodal models (LMMs) new skills without erasing prior abilities? We study sequential fine-tuning on five target skills while monitoring general ability on eight held-out benchmarks across three model families. Surprisingly, we find that performance lost on held-out tasks after fine-tuning on one skill can partly recover when the model is subsequently tuned on a different skill. We trace this behavior to a measurable shift in the output token distribution, manifested through a simple counting-bias probe that shows the shift co-varies with forgetting. Guided by this insight, we identify two simple, robust tuning recipes that learn strongly while limiting drift: (i) updating only the self-attention projection layers (SA Proj., Δ learning +24.9 / Δ held-out forgetting-0.6), and (ii) updating only the MLP Gate&Up while freezing the Down projection (+30.5 / -2.1). Both substantially outperform full-LLM tuning (+31.8 / -23.3) in the learning-forgetting trade-off. We also compare against common forgetting mitigation methods: Learning without Forgetting (LwF), LoRA, Mixture-of-Experts, and weight-space interpolation (WiSE-FT), and find that our selective tuning recipes match or exceed their learning-stability balance while remaining simpler, requiring no replay, auxiliary parameters, or per-stage tuning. These results hold across LLaVA-OneVision, LLaVA-NeXT, and Qwen2.5-VL, confirming that the key to teaching LMMs new skills without forgetting lies in controlling output distribution shift by choosing which components to tune. Code will be made available.
Sources
- Qwen2.5-VL Technical Report
- What Does BERT Look At? An Analysis of BERT's Attention
- PathVQA: 30000+ Questions for Medical Visual Question Answering
- LLaVA-OneVision: Easy Visual Task Transfer
- SEED-Bench: Benchmarking Multimodal LLMs with Generative Comprehension
- VLM-Assisted Continual learning for Visual Question Answering in Self-Driving
- Revisiting MLLMs: An In-Depth Analysis of Image Classification Abilities
- An Empirical Study of Catastrophic Forgetting in Large Language Models During Continual Fine-tuning
- Ask and Remember: A Questions-Only Replay Strategy for Continual Visual Question Answering
- Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPT
- ContCap: A scalable framework for continual image captioning
- Enhancing Continual Learning in Visual Question Answering with Modality-Aware Feature Distillation
- In-context Learning and Induction Heads
- RL's Razor: Why Online Reinforcement Learning Forgets Less
- Skywork-MoE: A Deep Dive into Training Techniques for Mixture-of-Experts Language Models
- LMMs-Eval: Reality Check on the Evaluation of Large Multimodal Models
Related papers
- MAVEN-T: Reinforced Heterogeneous Distillation for Real-Time Multi-Agent Trajectory Prediction
- Model Discovery Agent: LLM-assisted Bayesian experiment design for data-efficient discovery of mechanistic world models
- Agents' Last Exam
- The Clinician's Veto: Navigating Trust, Liability, and Uncertainty in Autonomous AI Prescribing
- MindHelper: Closed-Loop Embodied Mental-State Reasoning for Precision Intervention
- Incumbent Advantage: Brand Bias and Cognitive Manipulation Dynamics in LLM Recommendation Systems