Fractional 1/3 quantum vortices in chiral d+id kagome superconductors
Listen
Radio episode about this paper
Transcript
Introduction to the show: ident: Quantum Radio. Generated commentary on the latest quantum physics and condensed matter papers.
Kai: We're looking at the paper: "Fractional 1/3 quantum vortices in chiral d+id kagome superconductors".
Mira: The gist: Fractional 1/3 quantum vortices permeate the ground state condensate in chiral d + id superconductors on the kagome lattice,
Kai: First, who's behind it and why it matters.
Paper summary: Kai: So, we've just been looking at how these fractional vortices appear in chiral d+id superconductors on the kagome lattice. The core thesis of this paper is that fractional vortices permeate the ground state condensate when an external field is applied.
Mira: They claim that each of these fractional vortices carries exactly one third of the superconducting flux quantum, denoted as Φ0 equals h/6e, and crucially, they show that each vortex has a characteristic signature linked to one of the three sublattice degrees of freedom in the kagome lattice.
Lev: That's a big claim because it suggests that these aren't just minor fluctuations; they are fundamental structural elements dictated by the lattice itself. It moves them beyond simple flux quantization.
Kai: Exactly, and this matters because we’ve seen experimental hints of time-reversal symmetry breaking in kagome metals, and this theoretical work gives us a specific prediction about what the state should look like under an external field.
Mira: The relevance is that these fractional vortices are discussed in the context of chiral triplet superfluidity, and even singlet superconducting states with spontaneous time-reversal symmetry breaking are thought to host them.
Lev: If they are hosting them, it means that any experimental signature we look for—like magnetic measurements or perhaps some specific NMR relaxation rates—should reflect this fractional structure rather than just a standard vortex pattern.
Kai: The paper sets the stage by using self-consistent microscopic calculations that incorporate the characteristics of the kagome lattice band structure to get these findings.
Mira: And they build their model using a pairing mechanism that favors the d+id state close to those van Hove singularities, specifically through next-next nearest-neighbor pairing which supports intra-sublattice pairing.
Lev: So, if we were building a simulation for this, we need to ensure our tight-binding model correctly captures those specific hopping terms and the resulting band structure features they are focusing on.
Kai: Right, that's what they do in their method section. They use a tight-binding model where the normal state Hamiltonian has terms like HTB = -t X <rr',σc†r'σcrσ - µ X r,σc†rσcrσ where t is the nearest neighbor hopping and µ is the chemical potential.
Mira: And when you diagonalize that Hamiltonian, you get three electronic bands including a flat band and two van Hove singularities at the M points in the n equals two and n equals one bands, respectively <ref:2602.17399#pg1>.
Lev: That specific structure with those three bands sounds like it has some interesting implications for how we might approach error correction; perhaps we’ll need a code that is inherently aware of these three distinct sublattices from the start.
Kai: And the pairing interaction favors this E2g d-wave order close to those van Hove singularities, especially through next-next nearest-neighbor pairing which supports intra-sublattice pairing.
Mira: So, the entire setup hinges on that specific type of interaction favoring intra-sublattice coupling in a way that couples to those singular points. It’s very specific physics.
Lev: I see why they focus so much on the NNNN pairing; it implies that standard nearest-neighbor pairing might not be enough to capture the essential physics here, right?
Kai: Right, they are pushing for that next-next nearest-neighbor pairing because it’s what supports those intra-sublattice coupling effects they are trying to model.
Mira: And Peierls phases are incorporated into the real space BdG formalism using substitution tr'r seven→ tr're iφr'r, which is a way to handle the gauge structure in that inhomogeneous state.
Lev: Handling those Peierls phases in a real-space BdG framework sounds computationally intensive; how much overhead does that really land on your simulation time?
Kai: It’s intensive, but they are doing it because they need to see the physics of the inhomogeneous state directly, not just an effective theory. They want to see exactly what's happening at those van Hove singularities.
Mira: And ultimately, the whole point is to show that these fractional vortices are a real feature of chiral d+id kagome superconductors under an external field, which has been motivating parts of their work on materials like AV3Sb5.
Conclusion: Kai: So, wrapping up this look at "Fractional one/three quantum vortices in chiral d+id kagome superconductors" <ref:2602.17399#pg1,Fractional 1/3 quantum vortices in chiral d+id kagome superconductors>. The authors are Philipsen, Barkman, Kreisel and Andersen. The main thing they’re saying is that these coreless vortices are actually composed of multiple fractional vortices.
Mira: They emphasize that each of these constituent fractional vortices carries one third of the superconducting flux quantum, which is h/6e. And we established earlier that they have a characteristic signature related to one of the three sublattice degrees of freedom—A, B or C.
Lev: So what this means in practical terms for us is that we are looking at a situation where the structure isn't just simple flux lines, but these complex bound structures linked to the lattice topology.
Kai: It suggests that when you look at experimental data, especially scanning SQUID microscopy or STM studies on kagome superconductors, you should be looking specifically for these fractional vortices instead of expecting conventional ones.
Mira: And it also points toward a limitation in their approach: they note that moving from the microscopic picture to an effective twocomponent GL field theory seems to lose some of this specific information about the sublattice degrees of freedom.
Lev: So, if we try to use simpler models, we risk missing the key physics that comes from those microscopic details, which is a major caveat when scaling up any theory for real hardware.
Kai: Right. The authors are motivating new experimental scanning SQUID microscopy or STM studies to look for conditions where these fractional vortices can be observed in kagome superconductors.
Mira: And they also stress that their theoretical results are general and could apply to any kagome lattice featuring chiral time-reversal symmetry breaking superconductivity, which broadens the scope significantly.
Lev: That's good because it means this isn't just a result for one specific material; it’s a fundamental prediction about the physics of these materials in general.
Kai: So, basically, this paper provides a detailed microscopic picture of what happens when you introduce an external field to these chiral d+id kagome superconductors.
Mira: And the key is that you have to account for those specific lattice details—the three sublattices—to understand the vortex state fully.
Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen · Department of Physics and Astronomy, Uppsala University
cond-mat.supr-con, cond-mat.str-el
Submitted: 2026-02-19
Updated: 2026-02-19
Comments: 12 pages, 12 figures
Journal ref: Phys. Rev. B 114, 194512 (2026)
DOI: 10.1103/jndp-2gbt
License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Importance score: 82/100
The gist: The gist: Fractional 1/3 quantum vortices permeate the ground state condensate in chiral d + id superconductors on the kagome lattice, each carrying one third of the superconducting flux quantum and
Key concepts
- Chiral d+id Superconductors
- These are a specific type of superconductor where the pairing symmetry involves both d-wave and id-wave components. 'Chiral' means the superconducting order parameter breaks time-reversal symmetry, which is crucial for hosting fractional vortices in this context.
- Kagome Lattice
- This refers to a specific two-dimensional crystal structure made of interconnected triangles. The paper uses its unique band structure—featuring van Hove singularities—to model the electronic properties that influence vortex formation.
- Fractional Vortices (1/3 Flux)
- These are vortices that carry only one-third of the standard superconducting flux quantum ($\Phi_0$). They are not conventional vortices and their existence is linked to the specific symmetry of the chiral d+id state and its interaction with the lattice structure.
- Sublattice Degrees of Freedom
- The kagome lattice has three distinct sublattices (A, B, C). The paper shows that fractional vortices are associated with these individual sublattices, meaning their topological signature depends on which sublattice they belong to.
Terminology
Summary
The gist: Fractional 1/3 quantum vortices permeate the ground state condensate in chiral d + id superconductors on the kagome lattice, each carrying one third of the superconducting flux quantum and exhibiting a characteristic signature related to one of the three sublattice degrees of freedom
Introduction and Motivation
The study investigates the nature of vortices in chiral d + id superconductors on the kagome lattice using self-consistent microscopic calculations that incorporate the characteristics of the band structure of the kagome lattice. The research is motivated by recent experimental developments reporting evidence of time-reversal symmetry breaking in the superconducting state of kagome metals. The paper discusses how fractional vortices, which carry only a fraction of superconducting flux quantum Φ0 = h/2e [1], play a key role in the superconductor’s response to external fields and thermal fluctuations. Fractional vortices have been studied in the context of chiral triplet superfluidity and triplet superconductors, and even singlet superconducting states with spontaneous time-reversal symmetry breaking (TRSB) are believed to host fractional vortices. In the chiral triplet p + ip state, fractional vortices necessarily carry a half flux quantum, enforced by the symmetry relating the two order parameter components to each other. A different kind of fractional vortices has been proposed in multi-gap superconductors, associated with phase winding in only one of the gap components.
Methodology
The methodology employs a pairing mechanism which favors the d + id state close to the van Hove singularities in the kagome bandstructure. A microscopic and self-consistent BdG framework is used to study the inhomogeneous superconducting state in the presence of an external magnetic field.
-
The electronic structure of the kagome lattice is described using a tight-binding model, where the normal state Hamiltonian is given by HTB = -tX<rr',σc†r'σcrσ - µXr,σc†rσcrσ (1).
-
The diagonalization of the Hamiltonian yields three electronic bands, including a flat band and two van Hove singularities at the M points in the n = 2 and n = 1 bands, respectively.
-
The superconducting state is modeled via a mean-field treatment of the interaction Hamiltonian, leading to the Bogoliubov-de Gennes (BdG) Hamiltonian HBdG = Ψ†HTB ∆∆† -HTTBΨ (5).
-
The pairing interaction favors E2g (d-wave) order close to the van-Hove singularities, particularly through next-next nearest-neighbor (NNNN) pairing which supports intra-sublattice pairing.
-
Peierls phases are incorporated into the real space BdG formalism using substitution tr'r 7→ tr're iφr'r (10).
Results and Vortex Structure
The study focuses on vortex states in chiral d + id superconductivity on the kagome lattice near the upper van Hove singularity (UvHS).
-
The system is initialized in the homogeneous ∆+ state, and a chiral superconducting state spontaneously breaks time-reversal symmetry.
-
For an out-of-plane magnetic field (⊙ direction), the local density of states (LDOS) displays a hexagonal shape with six distinct regions of enhanced LDOS, indicating the presence of six vortices. Each vortex carries a magnetic flux Φ0/3 and is associated with only one sublattice degree of freedom (A in blue, B in orange, C in green).
-
For an into-plane magnetic field (⊗ direction), the LDOS shows two triangular features, suggesting that each triangular feature does not correspond to a single conventional Abrikosov vortex but instead consists of three tightly bound fractional vortices.
-
The current patterns reveal that the clockwise current on the interior of the hexagon in the out-of-plane field induces a magnetic field that opposes the external field, with local maxima where fractional vortices are located.
-
The chiral order parameters ∆+ and ∆- form a closed domain wall enclosing these fractional vortices, which is energetically stable due to the repulsive interaction of fractional vortices on domain walls.
Sublattice Dependence and Topology
The distinction between vortex states at the UvHS and LvHS is directly related to the distinct microscopic sublattice structure of the Bloch states at these two van Hove singularities.
-
At the UvHS, fractional vortices belong to individual sublattice degrees of freedom (A, B or C), where the active band exhibits strong sublattice interference causing the Fermi surface to be extremely sublattice polarized.
-
At the LvHS, there is an inverted sublattice character inherited from the lower band's interference compared to the upper one, meaning that where LDOS peaks were confined to a single sublattice at UvHS, they are in two of the sublattices (B and C) at LvHS.
-
The topological charge density is computed using a CP N−1 topological invariant, which is independent of the basis choice and captures the non-trivial topological structure embedded in the relative degrees of freedom.
-
For both field directions, the total topological invariant is found to be Q = ±2, which is consistent with the expected flux quantization from continuum theory. The local topological charge density peaks align well with the locations of enhanced LDOS and currents, demonstrating its connection to these observable quantities.
-
The difference in vortex structure between UvHS and LvHS demonstrates clearly the importance of the microscopic character of the sublattice interference.
Conclusion
The theoretical study finds that coreless vortices consisting of multiple fractional vortices, each carrying one third of the superconducting flux quantum Φ0 = h/6e, are formed in chiral d + id superconductors on the kagome lattice. These fractional vortices belong to individual sublattice degrees of freedom (A, B or C) at the UvHS and exhibit an inverted sublattice character at the LvHS. The results suggest that key structure may get lost when moving from a fully microscopic picture to the effective twocomponent GL field theory, indicating that the fractionalization is influenced by microscopic details like sublattice degrees of freedom. The findings motivate new experimental scanning SQUID microscopy or STM studies to locate favorable conditions for observing these fractional vortices in kagome superconductors.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
F.A.S.P and B.M.A acknowledge support from the Independent Research Fund Denmark Grant No. 5241-00007B. M.B was supported by a research grant (VIL69220) from VILLUM FONDEN. A.K acknowledges support by the Danish National Committee for Research Infrastructure (NUFI) through the ESSLighthouse Q-MAT.
REFERENCES
[1] M. Sigrist and K. Ueda, Phenomenological theory of unconventional superconductivity, Rev. Mod. Phys. 63, 239 (1991)
[2] M. Sigrist and D. F. Agterberg, The role of domain walls on the vortex creep dynamics in unconventional superconductors, Progress of Theoretical Physics 102, 965 (1999)
[3] E. Babaev, Fractional-flux vortices and spin superfluidity in triplet superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 137001 (2005)
[4] E. Berg, E. Fradkin, and S. Kivelson, Charge-4e superconductivity from pair-density-wave order in certain high-temperature superconductors, Nature Physics 5, 830 (2009)
[5] M. M. Salomaa and G. E. Volovik, Half-quantum vortices in superfluid 3He-A, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 1184 (1985)
[6] M. M. Salomaa and G. E. Volovik, Quantized vortices in superfluid 3He, Rev. Mod. Phys. 59, 533 (1987)
[7] G. E. Volovik, The Universe in a Helium Droplet (Oxford University Press, 2009)
[8] S. Autti, V. V. Dmitriev, J. T. M¨akinen, A. A. Soldatov, G. E. Volovik, A N Yudin, V V Zavjalov, and V B Eltsov, Observation of half-quantum vortices in topological superfluid 3He (2016)
[9] J. T.
Improvements for AI systems
-
Increased Predictive Capability for TRSB Kagome Superconductors: The system can now predict vortex states in chiral d+id superconductors on kagome lattices by considering both upper and lower van Hove singularities (UvHS and LvHS), as the paper shows
the difference between the vortex states at the UvHS and LvHS will be directly related their distinct microscopic sublattice structure of the Bloch states.
-
Accurate Characterization of Fractional Vortices: The AI can now distinguish between different fractional vortex types, specifically identifying that
each fractional vortex carries one third of the superconducting flux quantum and exhibits a characteristic signature related to one of the three sublattice degrees of freedom,
which is crucial for interpreting experimental signatures like those from STM or scanning SQUID measurements. -
Model Refinement Beyond Simple GL Theory: The AI can move beyond the predictions of an
effective two-component Ginzburg-Landau (GL) theory
by solving thefully microscopic BdG Hamiltonian,
thus capturing effects that a simpler theory might miss, such as the finding thatthe one-third fractional vortices we find are self-consistent solutions to the mean-field equations of the BdG Hamiltonian.
-
Directional Field Dependence Analysis: The system can predict how vortex structures change based on external field orientation, noting that
the difference in the collective structure formed under the opposite field directions is expected from the fact that the bulk superconducting state is chiral and breaks time-reversal symmetry,
leading toqualitatively distinct LDOS pattern[s] due to the different arrangement of fractional vortices.
-
Topological Invariant Calculation: The AI can compute a basis-independent topological invariant, defined as
a CP N−1 topological invariant,
which is used as abasis-independent indicator where in space the fractional vortices are located,
connecting the calculated charge density to observable quantities like LDOS peaks.
Sources
- Visualization of vortex sheets and half quantum vortices in the chiral odd-parity superconductor UPt$_{3}$
- Observation of single-quantum vortex splitting in the Ba$_{1-x}$K$_x$Fe$_2$As$_2$ superconductor
- Direct observation of quantum vortex fractionalization in multiband superconductors
- The kagome Hubbard model from a functional renormalization group perspective
- Nodal superconductivity and superconducting domes in the topological Kagome metal CsV3Sb5
- Protection of Unconventional Superconductivity from Disorder
Related papers
- A minimal model for the Weyl nodes and Fermi arcs of PtBi 2
- Surface-extended Andreev bound states emerging from intrinsic surface superconductivity of PtBi 2
- Relaxation Dynamics of Superconducting/Normal Interfaces in the Intermediate State of a type-I superconductor
- Transforming Native Oxide into a Metallic Platinum--Niobium Alloy for Passivation of Superconducting Niobium Films
- Unconventional superconductivity from lattice quantum disorder
- Pressure-induced Lifshitz and quantum phase transitions in electron-doped cuprate superconductor