CLIOPATRA: Extracting Private Information from LLM Insights
cs.CR
Submitted: 2026-03-10
Updated: 2026-10-13
Comments: To appear in the Proceedings of the 40th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2026). Please cite the NeurIPS version
Code: https://github.com/microsoft/presidio
Project page: https://microsoft.github.io/presidio/faq
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: The widespread adoption of AI assistants has encouraged the development of privacy-aware platforms designed to extract insights from real-world usage.
Terminology
Abstract
The widespread adoption of AI assistants has encouraged the development of privacy-aware platforms designed to extract insights from real-world usage. Their privacy protections primarily rely on layering multiple heuristic techniques, such as PII redaction, clustering, aggregation, and LLM-based privacy auditing. In this paper, we put their privacy claims to the test by presenting CLIOPATRA, the first attack against "privacy-preserving" LLM-based insights systems. Our attack involves an adversary that carefully designs and inserts malicious chats into the system to break multiple layers of protections and induce the leakage of sensitive information from a target user's chat. We evaluate CLIOPATRA on one such platform, Anthropic's Clio (now called "Anthropic Insights"), and target synthetically generated medical chats to show that an adversary can successfully and confidently (with nearly 100% precision) extract the medical history contained in these chats in up to 65% of cases. We also show that CLIOPATRA can stealthily extract information by obfuscating the private information in the generated insights. Finally, we demonstrate that existing ad hoc mitigations, such as LLM-based privacy auditing, are unreliable and fail to detect major leaks. Overall, our findings indicate that, even when layered, current heuristic protections are insufficient to adequately protect user data, and that prompt injection has been an understudied risk in LLM-based insight systems.
Sources
- Is My Data in Your Retrieval Database? Membership Inference Attacks Against Retrieval Augmented Generation
- Design Patterns for Securing LLM Agents against Prompt Injections
- Phantom: General Backdoor Attacks on Retrieval Augmented Language Generation
- Meta-SecAlign: Training LLMs against Prompt Injection for Robust Agents
- Defeating Prompt Injections by Design
- The Llama 3 Herd of Models
- Which Economic Tasks are Performed with AI? Evidence from Millions of Claude Conversations
- Defending Against Indirect Prompt Injection Attacks With Spotlighting
- Gemma 3 Technical Report
- The Attacker Moves Second: Stronger Adaptive Attacks Bypass Defenses Against Llm Jailbreaks and Prompt Injections
- Clio: Privacy-Preserving Insights into Real-World AI Use
- Qwen3 Technical Report
Related papers
- SoK: AI-Augmented Binary Reversing
- Relaxed Sender Anonymity for CBDC Interbank Settlement: A Zero-Knowledge Approach on Permissioned EVM
- Calibration-Family Overfit: Why Trusted Sabotage Monitors Don't Transfer Across Lineages
- Efficient Fuzzy PSI under One-Sided Assumptions
- Sealing the Audit-Runtime Gap for LLM Skills
- Token Composition: A Graph Based on EVM Logs