Negative Advantages Is a Double-Edged Sword: Calibrating advantages in GRPO for Search Agents
cs.CL, cs.AI
Submitted: 2026-04-20
Updated: 2026-10-12
Comments: Accepted by EMNLP 2026 Findings
Code: https://github.com/wujwyi/CalibAdv
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: Search agents achieve strong question-answering performance through multi-turn interactions with search engines, with Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) being a widely used training algorithm.
Terminology
Abstract
Search agents achieve strong question-answering performance through multi-turn interactions with search engines, with Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) being a widely used training algorithm. However, GRPO-style algorithms still face several challenges in multi-hop search settings. First, correct intermediate steps are often penalized when the final answer is wrong. Second, training is highly unstable, often causing degradation of natural language ability or even catastrophic training collapse. Our analysis attributes these issues to coarse-grained advantage assignment and an imbalance between positive and negative advantages. To address these problems, we propose CalibAdv, an advantage calibration method specifically designed for search agents that enables more accurate and more stable modeling of penalties and rewards. Specifically, CalibAdv leverages the correctness of intermediate steps to downscale excessive negative advantages at a fine-grained level. It then further rebalances positive and negative advantages to improve training stability. Importantly, CalibAdv adopts a lightweight design that calibrates advantages from standard rollout signals, making it simple and easy to deploy. Extensive experiments across three models and seven benchmarks demonstrate that CalibAdv improves both model performance and training stability. Our code is available at https://github.com/wujwyi/CalibAdv.
Sources
- On Group Relative Policy Optimization Collapse in Agent Search: The Lazy Likelihood-Displacement
- Group-in-Group Policy Optimization for LLM Agent Training
- Constructing A Multi-hop QA Dataset for Comprehensive Evaluation of Reasoning Steps
- Tree Search for LLM Agent Reinforcement Learning
- Search-R1: Training LLMs to Reason and Leverage Search Engines with Reinforcement Learning
- TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehension
- Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answering
- When Not to Trust Language Models: Investigating Effectiveness of Parametric and Non-Parametric Memories
- Measuring and Narrowing the Compositionality Gap in Language Models
- Defeating the Training-Inference Mismatch via FP16
- Qwen2.5 Technical Report
- DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models
- Deep Research: A Systematic Survey
- R1-Searcher: Incentivizing the Search Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning
- ZeroSearch: Incentivize the Search Capability of LLMs without Searching
- MuSiQue: Multihop Questions via Single-hop Question Composition
- Text Embeddings by Weakly-Supervised Contrastive Pre-training
- RAGEN: Understanding Self-Evolution in LLM Agents via Multi-Turn Reinforcement Learning
- StepSearch: Igniting LLMs Search Ability via Step-Wise Proximal Policy Optimization
- Reinforcing Multi-Turn Reasoning in LLM Agents via Turn-Level Reward Design
Related papers
- Exploring Solution Divergence and Its Effect on Large Language Model Problem Solving
- Ishigaki-IDS-Bench: A Benchmark for Generating Information Delivery Specification from BIM Information Requirements
- Subliminal Steering: Stronger Encoding of Hidden Signals
- MedStruct-S: A Benchmark for Key Discovery, Key-Conditioned QA and Semi-Structured Extraction from OCR Clinical Reports
- The End of Transformers? On Challenging Attention and the Rise of Sub-Quadratic Architectures
- Untangling the Mechanisms of Misleading Context in Medical Question Answering