Exact analytical edge states in the extended Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model

arXiv:2604.20561 · cond-mat.other, quant-ph · Submitted 2026-04-22 · Read on arXiv

Listen

Radio episode about this paper

Transcript

Introduction to the show: ident: Quantum Radio. Generated commentary on the latest quantum physics and condensed matter papers.

Kai: We're looking at the paper: "Exact analytical edge states in the extended Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model".

Mira: The gist The authors derive exact analytical expressions for the edge states of a semi-infinite extended Su–Schrieffer–Heeger (eSSH) model,

Kai: First, who's behind it and why it matters.

Paper summary: Kai: So, this paper is about the extended Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model and they’re deriving exact analytical expressions for the edge states of a semi-infinite chain.

Mira: Yeah, it tackles how hopping processes between translationally inequivalent atoms beyond nearest neighbors affect this model. The big claim here is they get closed-form expressions for the zero-energy eigenstates, which are what we call the topologically relevant states.

Lev: From an engineering standpoint, getting those exact analytical expressions is huge because it means we can actually predict the behavior of these edge states without relying on messy numerical simulations for every parameter set.

Kai: Exactly. The paper establishes a bulk-boundary correspondence based on the winding number of the bulk Hamiltonian under periodic boundary conditions. This winding number determines the topological phase diagram, and changes in that winding number coincide with bulk gap closings, and also with the condition z equals one for those edge-state solutions >

Mira: That's where it gets interesting. They classify this model as belonging to class BDI of topological insulators, which means we can characterize it using an integer topological invariant called the winding number δ >

Lev: And that winding number is given by the formula delta equals one over two pi integral over the Brillouin zone of phi dot k dk >

Kai: That winding number is stable under any deformation of the Hamiltonian that preserves chiral symmetry and doesn't close the gap, which is a key piece of information for understanding the robustness of these topological phases >

Mira: They then show how this winding number relates to different physical regimes based on parameters like u0, u1, and u2 >

Lev: When they look at those different regimes, they find that depending on how large or small u2 is, the roots of the factors Q1(z) and Q2(z) give you different types of edge states >

Kai: Specifically, when u2 is large and positive, both roots are complex conjugates with magnitudes like p u0 over u2 >

Mira: And that leads to two solutions of the form psi A (z plus or minus), whose weight lies only on the A-type sites in that case >

Lev: If you look at the case where u2 is large and negative, they find roots like z plus equals one over two u2 plus q u0 over u2 plus one over two squared >

Kai: And that appearance of two edge states is consistent with the bulk winding number delta equals two in that regime > <ref:2604.20561#pg1>

Mira: But then when u2 is small, they approximate those roots as z plus approximately minus u0 and z minus approximately minus one over u2 in leading order terms >

Lev: The solution corresponding to psi A (z plus) is an edge state of the form psi A (z plus), which they say is consistent with a bulk winding number delta equals one > <ref:2604.20561#pg1>

Kai: It's interesting how the structure of those roots dictates what kind of edge state you get, and that directly links to the topological classification >

Mira: Now they apply this machinery to some experimental realizations, including one involving second-neighbor hopping u2 >

Lev: For finite chains, they derive approximate analytical expressions for the low-energy edge states and their energies, and these show excellent agreement with numerical results >

Kai: And the paper claims that these exact analytical results obtained for a semi-infinite chain can be extended to a finite chain of N unit cells within an error of the order of z squared n over delta g in the energy >

Mira: That error bound is pretty tight, which is good because it shows how reliable this analytical approach is when you move from infinite systems to finite ones >

Lev: The analysis also applies to bipartite superradiance lattices where they expect a topological phase transition from a trivial phase with delta equals zero to a non-trivial phase with delta equals two > <ref:2604.20561#pg2,a topological phase transition from a>

Kai: They show that the edge states are present when eta is greater than one, and no edge state is present when eta is less than one >

Mira: Overall, this paper provides the exact analytical expressions for the edge states of the eSSH model and shows how they relate to topological invariants like delta >

Lev: The main thing here for hardware realization would be that you can use a polynomial equation of degree M to solve this, which is significantly lower computational cost than standard numerical methods >

Kai: So, in short, the paper provides exact analytical expressions for open boundary conditions and shows that the number of edge states they get matches the bulk-boundary correspondence of topological phases >

Mira: They also show that their approximation is highly accurate when you look at finite chains, which clarifies the fundamental nature of these end states emerging in the extended Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model >

Conclusion: Kai: So, we're wrapping up this look at the paper "Exact analytical edge states in the extended Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model."

Mira: It’s basically about getting exact mathematical formulas for those edge states in a chain that has those extra hops beyond just nearest neighbors.

Lev: And the big takeaway is that they nail down a direct link between what happens in the bulk—the winding number—and what you actually see at the edges, which is super important for how we design these things.

Kai: So, if you’re driving or cooking and you hear this, it means they figured out exactly how many edge states there are based on some mathematical structure called a winding number.

Mira: It’s not just a guess; they derived closed-form expressions for those zero-energy eigenstates, which are the ones that matter topologically.

Lev: For us on the error correction side, having these exact analytical forms is useful because it tells us exactly what kind of states we need to look for when we build real hardware.

Kai: It shows that even in a complex system like this extended SSH model, you can get clean math for the boundary conditions.

Mira: And they show that this whole structure connects different physical regimes, depending on how big or small some parameters are in the Hamiltonian itself.

Lev: The implication is that we can use these exact formulas to predict behavior in systems where things change smoothly, like when a lattice transitions from one topological phase to another.

Kai: It gives us a solid foundation for understanding how these extended systems behave at their boundaries.

Mira: So, the authors have mapped out exactly what the topology of this model looks like based on its mathematical properties.

Lev: And this kind of precise characterization is exactly what we need when we’re trying to push the limits of quantum devices.

Centro Atómico Bariloche · Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientóficas y Técnicas

cond-mat.other, quant-ph

Submitted: 2026-04-22

Updated: 2026-04-22

Comments: 12 pages, 9 figures

Journal ref: Phys. Rev. B 114, 235404 (2026)

DOI: 10.1103/gbwx-s8fk

License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Importance score: 92/100

The gist: The gist The authors derive exact analytical expressions for the edge states of a semi-infinite extended Su–Schrieffer–Heeger (eSSH) model, which includes hopping processes between

Key concepts

Extended Su–Schrieffer–Heeger (eSSH) Model
This is a model used to study topological insulators where atoms can hop not just to their immediate neighbors but also to atoms further away. It's an extension of the standard SSH model, incorporating more complex hopping processes between translationally inequivalent sites.
Winding Number ($\delta$)
This is a topological invariant calculated from the bulk Hamiltonian under periodic boundary conditions. It quantifies the topological phase of the material and changes only when there is a bulk gap closing. For this model, it can be 0, 1, or 2.
Bulk-Boundary Correspondence
This principle states that the topological properties of a material's entire bulk (like its winding number) dictate the nature of its boundary states. Specifically, changes in the bulk winding number correspond exactly to the appearance or disappearance of edge states at the boundaries.

Terminology

Summary

The gist The authors derive exact analytical expressions for the edge states of a semi-infinite extended Su–Schrieffer–Heeger (eSSH) model, which includes hopping processes between translationally inequivalent atoms beyond nearest neighbors, and establish a bulk–boundary correspondence based on the winding number of the bulk Hamiltonian<ref:2604.20561#pg2>.

Topological Classification and Bulk-Boundary Correspondence

The topological phase diagram is determined from the winding number of the bulk Hamiltonian under periodic boundary conditions (PBC), where changes in this winding number coincide with bulk gap closings and with the condition z = 1 for the edge-state solutions<ref:2604.20561#pg3>. The model belongs to class BDI of topological insulators, characterized by an integer Z topological invariant<ref:2604.20561#pg4>. The topological invariant—the winding number—is given by the formula δ = 1/(2π) integral over the Brillouin zone of phi˙(k)dk<ref:2604.20561#pg4>. This winding number is stable under any deformation of the Hamiltonian that preserves chiral symmetry and does not close the gap<ref:2604.20561#pg4>.

Analytical Derivation of Edge States

Exact analytical expressions for the zero-energy eigenstates—the topologically relevant states—of a semi-infinite chain are obtained by employing a method introduced by Alase et al., which allows for closed-form expressions<ref:2604.20561#pg3>. The corresponding wave functions decay exponentially away from the edge, with a factor z for each additional unit cell<ref:2604.20561#pg4>. The bulk eigenvalue equation leads to a matrix equation for the coefficients u(z) and v(z), resulting in a non-trivial solution if and only if E squared − Q1(z)Q2(z) = 0<ref:2604.20561#pg4>. For zero-energy eigenstates (E = 0), this condition simplifies to Q1(z)Q2(z) = 0<ref:2604.20561#pg4>.

Analysis of Edge State Regimes

The analysis of the roots of the factors Q1(z) and Q2(z) reveals different physical regimes based on the parameters u0, u1, and u2<ref:2604.20561#pg4>.

(i).˜u2 is large enough and positive:

In this case, both roots are complex conjugate: z± = -1/(2˜u2) ± i qu˜0/u˜2− (1/(2˜u2))2, with z+ = z− = p u0/u2. This leads to two solutions of the form ψA(z±)⟩, whose weight lies on the A-type sites only<ref:2604.20561#pg4>.

(ii).˜u2 is large enough and negative:

The roots are z± = 1/(2u˜2) ± q u˜0/u˜2 + (1/(2u˜2))2, again with z±. This appearance of two edge states is consistent with the bulk winding number δ = 2<ref:2604.20561#pg4>.

(iii).˜u2 is small:

The roots are approximated as z+ ≈ -u˜0 and z− ≈ -1/u˜2 in leading order<ref:2604.20561#pg4>. The solution corresponding to ψA(z+⟩ is an edge state of the form ψA(z+)⟩, which is consistent with the bulk winding number δ = 1<ref:2604.20561#pg4>.

Application to Experimental Realizations

The analytical results are applied to two different experimental realizations of the model, including one involving second-neighbor hopping u2<ref:2604.20561#pg5>. For finite chains, approximate analytical expressions for the low-energy edge states and their energies are derived, which show excellent agreement with numerical results<ref:2604.20561#pg4>. The weights of each state, aj 2, in each set of parameters are shown in Figure 5<ref:2604.20561#pg8>. The exact analytical results obtained for a semi-infinite chain can be extended to the case of a finite chain of N unit cells within an error of the order of z2N /∆g in the energy<ref:2604.20561#pg12>.

Application to Bipartite Superradiance Lattices

The machinery developed in Section III is applied to obtain the edge states along the topological phase transition in bipartite superradiance lattices, where a topological phase transition from a trivial phase with δ = 0 to a non-trivial phase with δ = 2 is expected<ref:2604.20561#pg9>. The adiabatic changes of the Hamiltonian take place along the curve 1 − 4˜u0(η)˜u2(η) = 0, which is displayed in the left panel of Figure 8 as a red dashed line<ref:2604.20561#pg9>. The edge states are found to be present when η > 1, and no edge state is present when η.

Summary of Findings

The derived number of edge states is consistent with the bulk–boundary correspondence of topological phases<ref:2604.20561#pg4>. Exact analytical expressions are obtained for a chain with open boundary conditions, and approximate analytical expressions for low-energy edge states and their energies show excellent agreement with numerical results<ref:2604.20561#pg4>. The findings clarify the fundamental nature of the end states emerging in the extended Su–Schrieffer–Heeger model<ref:2604.20561#pg6>. The procedure based on Alase et al. can be straightforwardly extended by solving a polynomial equation of degree M, which entails a significantly lower computational cost than standard numerical methods<ref:2604.20561#pg6>.

Conclusion

The paper has derived exact analytical expressions for the edge states of a chain with open boundary conditions and demonstrated that the resulting number of edge states is consistent with the bulk–boundary correspondence of topological phases<ref:2604.20561#pg4>. The authors also demonstrate that the approximation is highly accurate<ref:2604.20561#pg4>. The work clarifies the fundamental nature of the end states emerging in the extended Su–Schrieffer–Heeger model<ref:2604.20561#pg6>. The exact analytical results obtained for a semi-infinite chain can be extended to the case of a finite chain of N unit cells within an error of the order of z2N /∆g in the energy<ref:2604.20561#pg12>. The work clarifies the fundamental nature of the end states emerging in the extended Su–Schrieffer-Heeger model<ref:2604.20561#pg6>.

Acknowledgments

The authors state that they are partially supported by CONICET, Argentina<ref:2604.20561#pg2>. The work is supported by CONICET, Argentina<ref:2604.20561#pg2>.

Appendix A

In this appendix, the authors obtain a pair of orthonormalized edge states corresponding to a winding number δ = 2<ref:2604.20561#pg11>. The norm is computed using the complex geometric series P∞j=p z j = z p 1−z, valid for z. The resulting normalized difference state is ψc−(z)⟩ = ψ−(z) / c−(z)<ref:2604.20561#pg11>. The resulting normalized sum state is ψc+(z)⟩ = c+(z)X∞j=1Aj⟩<ref:2604.20561#pg11>.

Appendix B

For a chain of N unit cells, the normalized states analogous to those in Eq.

Improvements for AI systems

  1. Improve Topological Phase Classification in eSSH Models with Winding Number Analysis: The improved system can accurately determine topological phases by calculating the winding number of the bulk Hamiltonian under periodic boundary conditions, which determine[s] the topological phase diagram.

  2. Develop Exact Analytical Edge State Solvers for Open Boundary Conditions: The system can derive exact analytical expressions for the edge states of a semi-infinite chain using methods like Alase et al., allowing it to find zero-energy eigenstates by solving polynomial equations of degree M, which is more efficient than standard numerical methods.

  3. Predict Edge State Properties for Experimental Realizations: The improved system can explain several notable features observed in the work of C. Li et al. reported in Ref. [8] by deriving analytical, approximate—yet highly accurate—expressions for the low-energy edge states and their energies, showing excellent agreement with the numerical results of Ref. [8].

  4. Real-Time Simulation of Topological Phase Transitions: The system can analyze experimental trajectories, such as those in Ref. [9], to derive the corresponding edge states and analyze their structure along this path, revealing nontrivial contributions from the different lattice sites to the spatial weight distribution of these states.

  5. Accurate Finite Chain Edge State Prediction: For finite chains of N unit cells, the system can obtain results within an error of the order of z2N /Δg in the energy, providing two pairs of edge states, each with its weight equally distributed between the two ends of the chain for specific experimental parameters.

Abstract

We investigate the topology of the different phases of the extended Su-Schrieffer-Heeger (eSSH) model, which includes hopping processes between translationally inequivalent atoms beyond nearest neighbors. Exact analytical expressions for the edge states of a semi-infinite eSSH chain are derived, with wave functions that decay exponentially from the boundary with a unit-cell decay factor z. From the winding number of the bulk Hamiltonian under periodic boundary conditions, we determine the topological phase diagram and establish the bulk-boundary correspondence: changes in the winding number coincide with bulk gap closings and with the condition z=1 for the edge-state solutions. For finite chains, we further obtain analytical, approximate expressions for the low-energy edge states, which are shown to be highly accurate.

Sources

Related papers