Constraining Galaxy Cluster Triaxiality via Weak Lensing --- I. Preparation for the Rubin Data Beyond Leading Order
astro-ph.CO, astro-ph.GA
Submitted: 2026-05-07
Updated: 2026-10-11
Comments: 37 pages, 18 figures, 4 tables
Code: https://github.com/oguri/glafic2
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: The 3D mass distributions of galaxy clusters are generally triaxial, a geometry that is difficult to constrain from projected observations.
Terminology
Abstract
The 3D mass distributions of galaxy clusters are generally triaxial, a geometry that is difficult to constrain from projected observations. In this work, we measure the projected halo shapes of clusters from weak lensing signatures using the Cluster Lensing Mass Modeling software, a tool developed by the Dark Energy Science Collaboration to analyze data from NSF-DOE Rubin Observatory's Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST). We measure ensemble halo ellipticity on the plane of the sky via axis-aligned stacking and multipole expansion of weak lensing signatures. We study a precursor dataset --- the redMaPPer cluster catalog, the metacalibration shape catalog, and the Directional Neighborhood Fitting photometric redshift catalog from the Dark Energy Survey Year 3 public data release. We select clusters that have a high centering probability (>90%) of the identified central galaxy, and use the satellite galaxy distribution to determine the major-axis orientation for stacking. We extend the analysis to the second order of ellipticity in monopole and quadrupole measurements. The projected ellipticity of the cluster sample is found to be 0.307+0.013-0.014 (axis ratio 0.530+0.016-0.015) with extra percent-level systematics introduced mainly by miscentering. The projected cluster ellipticity shows no statistically significant dependence on redshift or richness (mass proxy). We further verify the accuracy of the cluster shape measurement using mock catalogs. This analysis is applicable to datasets from wide-area cosmic surveys such as LSST, Euclid, and the Roman Space Telescope, where larger sample sizes will lead to tighter constraints on cluster shapes.
Sources
- The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Selected Galaxy Clusters Catalog
- Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Cluster Abundances, Weak Lensing, and Galaxy Clustering
- Metacalibration: Direct Self-Calibration of Biases in Shear Measurement
- A Catalog of Mass Models for Gravitational Lensing
- LSST Science Book, Version 2.0
- Roman Observations Time Allocation Committee: Final Report and Recommendations
- Multipole analysis of cluster weak lensing shear in The Three Hundred project
- Weak Gravitational Lensing
- Brightest Cluster Galaxy ellipticity as proxy for halo shape: Orientation bias, assembly bias, and potential selection effects in SZ-selected clusters
Related papers
- Angular clustering and bias of photometric quasars in the Kilo-Degree Survey Data Release 4
- A Novel kinetic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Estimator for Electron-Electron Correlations
- Magnetic fields at the dawn of structure formation I. The CARLA J1510+5958 proto-cluster
- Dark Energy Survey Year 6 Results: Weak Lensing and Galaxy Clustering Cosmological Analysis Framework
- Exploring the Impact of Systematic Bias in Type Ia Supernova Cosmology Across Diverse Dark Energy Parametrizations
- Non-Gaussian Galaxy Stochasticity and the Noise-Field Formulation