STEPS: Selective On-Policy Self-Distillation for Reasoning
cs.AI, cs.LG
Submitted: 2026-05-11
Updated: 2026-09-30
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: On-policy self-distillation (OPSD) uses a model as its own teacher under privileged context, providing token-level supervision on the model's own reasoning trajectories.
Terminology
Abstract
On-policy self-distillation (OPSD) uses a model as its own teacher under privileged context, providing token-level supervision on the model's own reasoning trajectories. However, persistent all-token guidance can degrade training in our math RL setting. Such guidance may unnecessarily constrain non-critical tokens and reinforce biases induced by privileged information unavailable at inference. Motivated by these risks, we propose STEPS, a selective OPSD framework that controls the location, direction, and duration of distillation. STEPS identifies critical spans in student rollouts, applies forward KL to key spans or reverse KL to error spans, and gradually transitions to pure GRPO after a short distillation phase. Across four models from three families, STEPS improves mean accuracy over GRPO. On Qwen3-8B, it raises average accuracy across four math benchmarks and GPQA-Diamond by an absolute 2.76% with a strong annotator. Using the training policy as its own annotator yields an absolute mean gain of 1.90%, with an estimated 2.7% training-time overhead amortized over 300 steps. Controlled ablations support semantic span selection, class-specific KL directions, and the hand-off to GRPO. Together, these results support brief, targeted self-distillation as an efficient complement to reward-driven reasoning training.
Sources
- On-Policy Distillation of Language Models: Learning from Self-Generated Mistakes
- Learning to Steer, Steering to See: Unveiling the Geometry of RLVR in Large Language Models via Trainable Vectors
- DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning
- GLM-5: from Vibe Coding to Agentic Engineering
- OpenThoughts: Data Recipes for Reasoning Models
- Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network
- Reinforcement Learning via Self-Distillation
- The Art of Scaling Reinforcement Learning Compute for LLMs
- Why Does Self-Distillation (Sometimes) Degrade the Reasoning Capability of LLMs?
- Unifying Group-Relative and Self-Distillation Policy Optimization via Sample Routing
- Rethinking On-Policy Distillation of Large Language Models: Phenomenology, Mechanism, and Recipe
- Filter, Then Reweight: Rethinking Optimization Granularity in On-Policy Distillation
- Critical Tokens Matter: Token-Level Contrastive Estimation Enhances LLM's Reasoning Capability
- Self-Distilled Policy Gradient
- MiMo-V2-Flash Technical Report
- Learning Query-Specific Rubrics from Human Preferences for DeepResearch Report Generation
- Privileged Information Distillation for Language Models
- GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmark
- DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models
- Self-Distillation Enables Continual Learning
Related papers
- MAVEN-T: Reinforced Heterogeneous Distillation for Real-Time Multi-Agent Trajectory Prediction
- Model Discovery Agent: LLM-assisted Bayesian experiment design for data-efficient discovery of mechanistic world models
- Agents' Last Exam
- The Clinician's Veto: Navigating Trust, Liability, and Uncertainty in Autonomous AI Prescribing
- MindHelper: Closed-Loop Embodied Mental-State Reasoning for Precision Intervention
- Incumbent Advantage: Brand Bias and Cognitive Manipulation Dynamics in LLM Recommendation Systems