Fourier Feature Pyramids for Physics-Informed Neural Networks
Listen
Radio episode about this paper
Transcript
Introduction to the show: ident: AI Radio. Generated commentary on the latest Artificial Intelligence papers.
Tom: Today's paper: "Fourier Feature Pyramids for Physics-Informed Neural Networks".
Jane: The gist The model beignet, which replaces random Fourier feature embedding with a learnable multi-resolution Fourier feature pyramid,
Tom: First, who's behind it and why it matters.
Title and authors: Jane: So, to start with, what’s this paper actually proposing? It seems like they're taking a standard PINN setup and fundamentally changing how the input features are generated.
Tom: They call their new architecture beignet, which stands for Bandlimited Embedding with Interpolated Grid Network. The core idea is to swap out the random Fourier feature embedding for this structured pyramid approach >
Lu: The authors are revisiting the choice of using equispaced spectral features in a way that makes sense for PINNs instead of just using them randomly. They introduce this multi-resolution pyramid structure and use stochastic grid shifts as a regularization technique >
Meng: From an engineering standpoint, why is this better than just making the MLP decoder bigger or changing the optimization strategy? We need to know what's actually happening with the parameter count here.
Tom: Well, they say this approach allows them to achieve higher accuracy in a compute-efficient manner by scaling the parameter count of this Fourier feature pyramid instead of scaling the neural network architecture >
The paper's summary: Jane: So, if we simplify it for someone listening who isn't deep in math, what’s the big payoff? How does this pyramid system actually improve solving those PDEs?
Tom: The main benefit is that they can compute spatial derivatives much more efficiently. They use the chain rule to combine derivatives of the neural network computed with automatic differentiation and with spectral derivatives from a Fast Fourier transform >
Lu: Because they compute the feature grid spectrally using FFT, they can do this way preserves the bandlimited structure of each pyramid level while allowing that nonlinear decoder to mix features across different scales >
Meng: Does that speed up training significantly when you're dealing with complex problems? We need to know if this is just a theoretical trick or something practical for deployment >
Tom: They show it’s substantially faster than the DFT evaluation of the same beignet model and PirateNet baseline in raw training-step time >
The paper's improvements: Jane: We talked about how they compute derivatives faster. What else are they trying to get right with this design? What specific improvements do they claim?
Tom: One major improvement is that beignet can directly control the representation bandlimit. This leads to more stable optimization, especially for difficult PDEs >
Lu: They also make an explicit choice over the maximum resolution of the finest grid, which sets the frequency support. They also allocate feature channels across levels to manage redundancy within each band >
Meng: What about when you look at specific equations? Does this structure help with different types of physics, like Allen–Cahn versus KdV?
Tom: Yes, they say their explicit control over spatial frequency content is particularly useful for PINNs because different PDEs have different spectral requirements >
Conclusion: Jane: So, to wrap up, what’s the final picture here? What does this Fourier Feature Pyramids for Physics-Informed Neural Networks paper mean for how we solve these kinds of problems?
Tom: It suggests that carefully designing the feature representation itself is a key ingredient for pushing PINNs into new high-accuracy regimes >
Lu: They show that by organizing equispaced features into a learnable multi-resolution pyramid and using stochastic grid shifts, you can make deterministic equispaced Fourier features effective in the PINN setting while retaining direct control over spatial bandwidth and frequency-band redundancy >
Meng: If this holds up on real traffic at scale, it means we might be able to train models that resolve fine-scale structures without needing massive amounts of parameters for every single equation >
Lalam: I'm confident in the results here. The authors show that beignet finds significantly more accurate solutions on PDE benchmarks using fewer parameters than state-of-the-art PINN methods >
Tom: And for the self-similar inviscid Burgers blowup problem, they drive fixed-grid residuals to near machine precision using Adam, which is much more accurate than Adam-trained coordinate MLP baselines >
Jane: It sounds like a lot of work focused on making the representation itself robust and controllable, which really moves us toward systems that can handle multiscale dynamics.
Lu: The way they handle the time dimension for time-dependent problems by dividing it into bins to store T plus one pyramids is also a clever addition > <ref:2605.24278#pg1>
Meng: I just hope we see this kind of parameter scaling working out when we try to deploy these models in a production environment where we can't afford massive memory footprints for every spatial level.
Brandon Zhao, Yixuan Wang, Jonathan T. Barron, Katherine L. Bouman, Dor Verbin, Pratul P. Srinivasan
California Institute of Technology · Google DeepMind
cs.LG
Submitted: 2026-05-22
Updated: 2026-10-06
Code: https://github.com/beignet-paper/beignet-release
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Importance score: 89/100
The gist: The gist The model beignet, which replaces random Fourier feature embedding with a learnable multi-resolution Fourier feature pyramid, achieves higher accuracy in compute-efficient manner by scaling
Key concepts
- Fourier Feature Pyramid
- This is a learnable structure of periodic spatial feature grids organized in multiple levels. The finest level captures high-frequency details, while coarser levels capture lower frequencies. This pyramid acts as an efficient way to embed spatial information into the neural network.
- Fourier Interpolation
- To evaluate the model at any continuous coordinate, Fourier interpolation is used across all levels of the pyramid. This technique reconstructs the feature vector corresponding to that specific input point by querying each level of the pyramid spectrally.
- Chain Rule for Derivatives
- Spatial derivatives are calculated efficiently by combining automatic differentiation with derivatives of the neural network and spectral derivatives from the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) applied to the feature grid. This allows for accurate computation even when using a complex, multi-resolution feature embedding.
Terminology
Summary
The gist The model beignet, which replaces random Fourier feature embedding with a learnable multi-resolution Fourier feature pyramid, achieves higher accuracy in compute-efficient manner by scaling parameter count instead of neural network architecture
How it works
-
beignet replaces the random Fourier feature embedding used by existing PINN models with a learnable multi-resolution Fourier feature pyramid
-
To query beignet at a continuous coordinate, Fourier interpolation is used at each level of the pyramid to return features at the input coordinate, and then these are decoded with a fully-connected neural network trunk
-
Spatial derivatives can be computed efficiently by using the chain rule to compose derivatives of the neural network computed with automatic differentiation with derivatives of the feature grid computed spectrally by the Fast Fourier transform (FFT)
-
beignet’s explicit control over spatial frequency content is particularly useful for PINNs because different PDEs have different spectral requirements
-
The finest grid resolution determines the maximum spatial frequency represented in the feature embedding, while the number of levels and channels per level controls the representational capacity within that band
Key Capabilities and Benefits
**: Spatial derivatives can be computed efficiently by using the chain rule to compose derivatives of the neural network computed with automatic differentiation with derivatives of the feature grid computed spectrally by the Fast Fourier transform (FFT) **
**: beignet can achieve higher accuracy in a compute-efficient manner by scaling the parameter count of this Fourier feature pyramid, instead of the less-efficient strategy of scaling the neural network architecture **
**: beignet can directly control the representation bandlimit, resulting in more stable optimization for difficult PDEs **
The model finds significantly more accurate solutions on PDE benchmarks using fewer parameters than state-of-the-art PINN methods. Furthermore, it minimizes residuals to near machine precision using Adam for the self-similar inviscid Burgers blowup problem, an accuracy regime previously attained only by using computationally expensive higher-order optimizers.
Architectural Components
**: The architecture relies on a learnable multi-resolution pyramid of periodic spatial feature grids, where each level stores a feature field at a prescribed grid resolution **
**: Evaluating the model at a point consists of two steps: first, using Fourier interpolation to query the input coordinate at each of the model’s levels, and then concatenating these resulting features before passing them through a decoder MLP **
**: The Fourier interpolation operation at the lth level can then be written as gθ(l) (x) = Re X k∈K(l) θb(l)[k] exp(2πi k · x), where K(l) is the set of signed FFT mode indices **
**: For time-dependent PDEs, the solution can vary sharply in space while evolving non-periodically in time, and the model divides the time axis into T bins to store T + 1 pyramids **
Performance on Benchmarks
beignet achieves substantially lower relative error across four JAX-PI benchmarks compared to JAX-PI and PirateNet architectures. Specifically, it reduces error by roughly an order of magnitude relative to PirateNet on Ginzburg–Landau. On the self-similar inviscid Burgers blowup problem, beignet drives the fixed-grid residuals to near machine precision using Adam, which is much more accurate than Adam-trained coordinate MLP baselines.
Design Choices and Ablations
**: The central design choice in beignet is not only the overall support of the Fourier features, but how capacity is distributed across resolutions, exposing two practical choices: the maximum resolution of the finest grid, which sets the representation’s frequency support, and the allocation of feature channels across levels **
**: The coarse-to-fine structure is a central part of the embedding because it allocates capacity across spatial bands and optimizes substantially better than stacking parametermatched feature grids at the finest resolution alone **
**: For KdV, adding very fine feature levels can hurt even when the parameter count is held fixed because high-frequency degrees of freedom are strongly amplified by the PDE operator, making optimization stiff **
**: The FFT-structured beignet residual path is substantially faster than the DFT/JVP evaluation of the same beignet model and PirateNet baseline in raw training-step time **
The structured residual path improves both the matched-NFE comparison and the feasible high-NFE training regime because it makes it practical to train with many more collocation points on a single GPU.
This work suggests that carefully designing the feature representation itself is a key ingredient for pushing PINNs into new high-accuracy regimes, opening the door to neural PDE solvers capable of resolving fine-scale structure, extreme multiscale dynamics, and challenging phenomena such as singularities. The authors manually verified all AI-generated code and results and substantially revised all AI-drafted text. The code is available at https://github.com/beignet-paper/beignet-release/. The authors would like to thank Matthieu Darcy for helpful discussions. This work was supported by the Amazon AI4Science Partnership Discovery Grant, Carver Mead New Adventures Fund, Ginsburg Prize, and Sloan Fellowship. The references include Ronen Basri et al. 2020 on Frequency bias in neural networks for input of non-uniform density and Charles L Fefferman 2006 on Existence and smoothness of the Navier-Stokes equation. The paper is available as arXiv:2605.24278v2 [cs.LG] 6 Oct 2026 The ISSN is 2835-8856. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=KqRnsEMYLx The authors take full responsibility for the content of this paper. The authors are listed as Brandon Zhao, Yixuan Wang, Jonathan T. Barron, Katherine L. Bouman, Dor Verbin, and Pratul P. Srinivasan. The department affiliations are listed as Department of Computing and Mathematical Sciences at California Institute of Technology, Cahill Center for Astronomy and Astrophysics at California Institute of Technology, and Google DeepMind. The authors acknowledge the use of Generative AI tools to assist with implementing the method, running experiments, and drafting paper text. The authors are listed as Brandon Zhao (∗byzhao@caltech.edu). The references include Thomas Y. Hou and Pengfei Liu 2015 on Self-similar singularity of a 1D model for the 3D axisymmetric Euler equations and Yongji Wang et al. 2026 on High precision PINNs in unbounded domains: application to singularity formulation in PDEs. The references include Zongyi Li, Nikola Kovachki, Kamyar Azizzadenesheli, Burigede Liu, Kaushik Bhattacharya, Andrew Stuart, and Anima Anandkumar 2024 on Physics-informed neural operator for learning partial differential equations and Thomas Y. Hou and Pengfei Liu 2025 on KAN: Kolmogorov-Arnold networks. The references include Zongyi Li, Hongkai Zheng, Nikola Kovachki, David Jin, Haoxuan Chen, Burigede Liu, Kamyar Azizzadenesheli, and Anima Anandkumar 2024 on Physics-informed neural operator for learning partial differential equations. The references include Zongyi Li et al. 2021 on Fourier neural operator for parametric partial differential equations and Zongyi Li et al. 2025 on Fourier neural operator for parametric partial differential equations. The references include David B Lindell et al. 2024 on BACON: Band-limited coordinate networks for multiscale scene representation and Vincent Sitzmann et al. 2020 on Implicit neural representations with periodic activation functions. The references include Matthew Tancik et al. 2020 on Fourier features let networks learn high frequency functions in low dimensional domains. The references include Sifan Wang et al. 2024 on PirateNets: Physics-informed deep learning with residual adaptive networks. The references include Yixuan Wang et al. 2026 on On the expressiveness and spectral bias of KANs. The references include Yongji Wang et al. 2023b on Asymptotic selfsimilar blow-up profile for three-dimensional axisymmetric Euler equations using neural networks. The references include Yixuan Wang et al. 2026 on High precision PINNs in unbounded domains: application to singularity formulation in PDEs and Yongji Wang et al. 2025b on Discovery of unstable singularities.
Improvements for AI systems
-
textbfWeight-Controlled Spectral Allocation for PDE Structures:
beignet
architecture leverages alearnable multi-resolution Fourier feature pyramid
to directly controlthe spatial bandwidth of the representation and the redundancy assigned to each frequency band.
This allows the model to adapt its spectral capacity based on the PDE, as demonstrated by how it allocates features in Allen–Cahn versus KdV problems. -
textbfEfficient Derivative Computation via FFT Composition: The system computes spatial derivatives by
differentiating the feature fields in Fourier space and then propagating through the decoder by the chain rule,
whichpreserves the bandlimited structure of each pyramid level while allowing the nonlinear decoder to mix features across scales.
This method is shown to be substantially faster than pointwise evaluations, as indicated by Table 8. -
textbfHigh-Precision Optimization via First-Order Methods: The architecture enables
Adam [to] drive the PDE residual near machine precision with the same first-order optimizer,
which suggests thatrepresentation design can reduce reliance on expensive second-order refinement for high-precision profile computations.
This capability is demonstrated in the self-similar inviscid Burgers blowup problem, where it achieves a residual of6.29 × 10−19
using Adam. -
textbfreatment of Time as Non-Periodic Coordinate: For time-dependent problems, the model uses
temporal pyramid blending
to treat time as a non-periodic coordinate, allowing the representation to remain bandlimited in space while handling temporal evolution vialinearly interpolat[ed] features.
This is crucial for modeling non-periodic temporal dynamics. -
textbfAdaptive Aliasing Mitigation: The inclusion of a
stochastic grid shift
during training helps mitigate aliasing issues by ensuring that the network does notlearn high-frequency functions that satisfy the PDE residual at grid points while remaining inaccurate between them,
as shown in Table 5.
Abstract
We present an improved neural field architecture for solving partial differential equations (PDEs). Current physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) provide a flexible framework for solving PDEs, but they struggle to achieve highly accurate solutions and require computation that scales poorly with parameter count. Our model, which we call beignet (Bandlimited Embedding with Interpolated Grid Network), replaces the random Fourier feature embedding used by existing PINN models with a trainable multi-resolution Fourier feature pyramid. To query beignet at a continuous coordinate, we use Fourier interpolation at each level of the pyramid to return features at the input coordinate, and then decode this vector with a fully-connected neural network trunk. Our model provides multiple benefits: 1) Spatial derivatives can be computed efficiently by using the chain rule to compose derivatives of the neural network computed with automatic differentiation with derivatives of the feature grid computed spectrally by the Fast Fourier transform (FFT). 2) beignet can achieve higher accuracy in a compute-efficient manner by scaling the parameter count of this Fourier feature pyramid, instead of the less-efficient strategy of scaling the neural network architecture. 3) beignet can directly control the representation bandlimit, resulting in more stable optimization for difficult PDEs. We demonstrate that beignet finds significantly more accurate solutions on PDE benchmarks using fewer parameters than state-of-the-art PINN methods. We further evaluate beignet on the self-similar inviscid Burgers blowup problem and show that it can minimize residuals to near machine precision using Adam, an accuracy regime previously attained only by using computationally expensive higher-order optimizers.
Sources
- FC-PINO: High Precision Physics-Informed Neural Operators via Fourier Continuation
- KANO: Kolmogorov-Arnold Neural Operator
- KAN 2.0: Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks Meet Science
- An Expert's Guide to Training Physics-informed Neural Networks
- Discovery of Unstable Singularities
Related papers
- Polynomial-Augmented Neural Networks (PANNs) with Weak Orthogonality Constraints for Enhanced Function and PDE Approximation
- AIRL-S: Unifying Reinforcement Learning and Search-Based Test-Time Scaling via Adversarial Inverse Reinforcement Learning
- Transformers as Bayesian In-Context Experimenters: Smoothness-Adaptive Efficient ATE Estimation
- Convergence issues in Relational Concept Analysis based on AOC-posets
- Beliefs Beyond Posteriors: The Predictive Cost of ELBO Binding
- Understanding Diffusion Models via Ratio-Based Function Approximation with SignReLU Networks