Beyond Locality: Feature-Boundary Auditing for OS-Integrated AI

arXiv:2606.10173 · cs.CR, cs.AI · Submitted 2026-06-08 · Read on arXiv

cs.CR, cs.AI

Submitted: 2026-06-08

Updated: 2026-10-12

License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

The gist: On-device inference reduces exposure to remote infrastructure, but it does not establish privacy for an operating-system assistant that aggregates cross-application data, retains derived state, or

Terminology

Abstract

On-device inference reduces exposure to remote infrastructure, but it does not establish privacy for an operating-system assistant that aggregates cross-application data, retains derived state, or delegates actions. We present a feature-boundary audit method for OS-integrated AI. It combines a taxonomy of six privacy-failure surfaces, a five-dimension control rubric with separate evidence grades, and explicit records for adjacent data and authority paths. We apply the method to Apple Foundation Models, Apple Private Cloud Compute, Android AICore/Gemini Nano, and Microsoft Recall using primary public documentation. The analysis distinguishes request isolation from contextual restraint, retained-state controls from non-retention, and attestation from task-appropriate disclosure. A formative comparison of two 20-item assessment records identifies ambiguities in notice, retention, path ownership, and accountability. The source-linked records identify supported controls and unresolved dependencies; we also specify a minimized event record and release comparison for fleet security triage and scoped forensic review.

Sources

Related papers