Text-Vision Co-Instructed Image Editing
cs.CV
Submitted: 2026-06-15
Updated: 2026-10-13
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: Existing image editing methods can be generally categorized into textual instruction-based and visual prompt-based ones.
Terminology
Abstract
Existing image editing methods can be generally categorized into textual instruction-based and visual prompt-based ones. Textual instructions are semantically expressive, but are limited by the coarse granularity of spatial control of the editing results. In contrast, visual prompts such as drag and point can provide precise spatial guidance, but are limited by the inherent ambiguity in semantic intent. To unify the strength of textual and visual prompts, we present Text-Vision Co-Instructed Image Editing, which jointly models textual instructions as semantic intent and sparse visual instructions as spatial guidance, aiming to achieve precise and intent-faithful image manipulation. To this end, we first construct a textual-visual instruction paired dataset with more than 23K samples derived from dynamic videos, enabling aligned supervision for cross-modal instruction. We then propose TV-Edit, a Textual-Visual instruction unified Editing framework to contextualize drag or point-based visual instructions with image-text semantics and lift them into semantic-aware control representations for pretrained editing backbones. By integrating semantic intent and spatial constraints, TV-Edit leads to more precise spatial control, less instruction ambiguity, and stronger structural consistency than text-only or drag-based alternatives. Finally, we establish TV-Edit-Bench, a deliberately designed benchmark to evaluate semantic faithfulness, spatial alignment, and visual consistency with ground-truth references and controlled textual-visual variations for reliable assessment. Our experiments across multiple editing backbones demonstrate that TV-Edit consistently yields more precise and intent-faithful edits, significantly outperforming state-of-the-art instruction-based and drag-based baselines.
Sources
- Qwen3-VL Technical Report
- GPT-4o System Card
- FlowEdit: Inversion-Free Text-Based Editing Using Pre-Trained Flow Models
- DNAEdit: Direct Noise Alignment for Text-Guided Rectified Flow Editing
- FLUX.1 Kontext: Flow Matching for In-Context Image Generation and Editing in Latent Space
- Step1X-Edit: A Practical Framework for General Image Editing
- Qwen-Image Technical Report
- GoodDrag: Towards Good Practices for Drag Editing with Diffusion Models
- DragLoRA: Online Optimization of LoRA Adapters for Drag-based Image Editing in Diffusion Model
- DragonDiffusion: Enabling Drag-style Manipulation on Diffusion Models
- CLIPDrag: Combining Text-based and Drag-based Instructions for Image Editing
- LightningDrag: Lightning Fast and Accurate Drag-based Image Editing Emerging from Videos
- Direct Inversion: Boosting Diffusion-based Editing with 3 Lines of Code
- ImgEdit: A Unified Image Editing Dataset and Benchmark
- ByteMorph: Benchmarking Instruction-Guided Image Editing with Non-Rigid Motions
- MotionEdit: Benchmarking and Learning Motion-Centric Image Editing
- DragFlow: Unleashing DiT Priors with Region Based Supervision for Drag Editing
- UltraVideo: High-Quality UHD Video Dataset with Comprehensive Captions
- SAM 2: Segment Anything in Images and Videos
- Scaling Instruction-Based Video Editing with a High-Quality Synthetic Dataset
Related papers
- Loss Knows Best: Detecting Annotation Errors in Videos via Loss Trajectories
- AnchorWeave: World-Consistent Video Generation with Retrieved Local Spatial Memories
- Benchmarking the Robustness of Foundation Models for Mammography under Domain Shift
- MambaX-Net: Dual-Input Mamba-Enhanced Cross-Attention Network for Longitudinal MRI Segmentation
- TeleOCR: Navigating Document Parsing Across Digital and Camera-Captured Documents
- A Survey on Efficient Vision-Language-Action Models