SearchMaster: Grounded and Regulated Self-Play for Search Agents
cs.AI
Submitted: 2026-08-03
Updated: 2026-10-12
Code: https://github.com/WentaoTan/SearchMaster
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: Training LLM-based search agents requires high-quality search data: tasks that demand genuine multi-hop retrieval and trajectories that use search tools effectively.
Terminology
Abstract
Training LLM-based search agents requires high-quality search data: tasks that demand genuine multi-hop retrieval and trajectories that use search tools effectively. Existing pipelines often depend on human-written tasks, expert demonstrations, or stronger teacher models. We present SearchMaster, a self-play framework that trains a shared LLM policy from search tasks it generates, solves, and verifies in a local search environment. The key challenge is that self-generated tasks and rollouts can yield misleading signals: pseudo multi-hop questions, success-rate difficulty estimates that ignore search depth, and rollouts with excessive opening but little targeted evidence acquisition. SearchMaster addresses these failure modes with three controls. An Evidence-Chain Generator (ECG) grounds task generation in explicit cross-document evidence chains to reduce pseudo multi-hop questions. A Search-Depth Reward (SDR) scores task difficulty by the search depth of successful rollouts rather than success rate alone, keeping retained tasks search-intensive. An Over-Opening Penalty (OOP) regulates tool use by discouraging excessive document opening, avoiding long but shallow browsing. Verified Proposer and Solver rollouts are then jointly optimized with GRPO. Across six deep-search benchmarks, SearchMaster raises average accuracy from 38.19% to 51.52% with a Qwen3.5-9B backbone and from 51.25% to 62.54% with a Qwen3.5-27B backbone. On BrowseComp-Plus, the corresponding gains are 30.1 and 17.8 percentage points. These results show that grounded and regulated self-play provides effective search-agent training data across model scales, without human-labeled QA pairs or expert demonstrations. The code is available at https://github.com/WentaoTan/SearchMaster.
Sources
- Tool-R0: Self-Evolving LLM Agents for Tool-Learning from Zero Data
- gpt-oss-120b & gpt-oss-20b Model Card
- xbench: Tracking Agents Productivity Scaling with Profession-Aligned Real-World Evaluations
- REDSearcher: A Scalable and Cost-Efficient Framework for Long-Horizon Search Agents
- Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilities
- R-Zero: Self-Evolving Reasoning LLM from Zero Data
- Search-R1: Training LLMs to Reason and Leverage Search Engines with Reinforcement Learning
- WebSailor-V2: Bridging the Chasm to Proprietary Agents via Synthetic Data and Scalable Reinforcement Learning
- WebSailor: Navigating Super-human Reasoning for Web Agent
- OpenResearcher: A Fully Open Pipeline for Long-Horizon Deep Research Trajectory Synthesis
- DeepSeek-V3 Technical Report
- WebExplorer: Explore and Evolve for Training Long-Horizon Web Agents
- Search Self-play: Pushing the Frontier of Agent Capability without Supervision
- DeepDive: Advancing Deep Search Agents with Knowledge Graphs and Multi-Turn RL
- O$^2$-Searcher: A Searching-based Agent Model for Open-Domain Open-Ended Question Answering
- WebGPT: Browser-assisted question-answering with human feedback
- BrowseMaster: Towards Scalable Web Browsing via Tool-Augmented Programmatic Agent Pair
- SealQA: Raising the Bar for Reasoning in Search-Augmented Language Models
- DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models
- OpenAI GPT-5 System Card
Related papers
- MAVEN-T: Reinforced Heterogeneous Distillation for Real-Time Multi-Agent Trajectory Prediction
- Model Discovery Agent: LLM-assisted Bayesian experiment design for data-efficient discovery of mechanistic world models
- Agents' Last Exam
- The Clinician's Veto: Navigating Trust, Liability, and Uncertainty in Autonomous AI Prescribing
- MindHelper: Closed-Loop Embodied Mental-State Reasoning for Precision Intervention
- Incumbent Advantage: Brand Bias and Cognitive Manipulation Dynamics in LLM Recommendation Systems