Weak lensing, Big Magnification: Recovering hidden lensing information from galaxy positions
astro-ph.CO
Submitted: 2026-10-02
Updated: 2026-10-02
Comments: 39 pages, 19 figures, 5 tables, 4 appendices
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: Galaxy clustering and weak gravitational lensing are powerful cosmological probes, traditionally combined through galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing in a 2 times2 pt analysis.
Terminology
Abstract
Galaxy clustering and weak gravitational lensing are powerful cosmological probes, traditionally combined through galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing in a 2 times2 pt analysis. An alternative is the foreground-background clustering cross-correlation induced by lensing magnification, but measurements have achieved lower signal-to-noise than shear-based lensing. We show that, for deep photometric samples, cancellation between galaxies with positive and negative magnification responses can suppress this signal. Using DES Year 6 photometry and Balrog synthetic-source injections, we explore high-redshift (z 0.7 - 2.5) samples split by the sign and amplitude of their magnification response. This separation reduces cancellation and can increase both signal-to-noise and cosmological constraining power. We call the combination of foreground clustering and foreground-background cross-correlations with response-selected background samples BigMag. Forecasts with DES-like simulated data vectors show that, for an optimistic sample configuration and sufficiently precise response calibration, BigMag can achieve constraining power comparable to traditional 2 times2 pt using galaxy positions alone. The same samples also enhance inverse galaxy-galaxy lensing (IGGL), a position-shear correlation dominated by magnification when the position sample lies behind the shape sample. Combining BigMag and IGGL further self-calibrates the magnification responses and yields marginalized S 8 constraints comparable to traditional 3 times2 pt analyses, and tighter for the more precise calibration scenarios considered here. The framework also enables near-zero-response samples for traditional 3 times2 pt and geometric lensing-ratio analyses. These results motivate further optimization and validation of galaxy selections to realize magnification as a complementary cosmological probe. [Abrg.]
Sources
- The Wide Field Infrared Survey Telescope: 100 Hubbles for the 2020s
- AtLAST -- Cosmology with submillimetre galaxies magnification bias
- Enhancing weak lensing redshift distribution characterization by optimizing the Dark Energy Survey Self-Organizing Map Photo-z method
- Dark Energy Survey Year 6 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing
- Cosmic magnification on multi-catalogue Herschel submillimetre galaxies
- Dark Energy Survey Year 6 Results: Redshift Calibration of the MagLim++ Lens Sample
- Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Multi-Probe Modeling Strategy and Validation
- Dark Energy Survey Year 6 Results: improved mitigation of spatially varying observational systematics with masking for the MagLim++ lens sample
- The NumPy array: a structure for efficient numerical computation
- Dark Energy Survey Year 6 Results: MagLim++ Lens Sample Selection and Measurements of Galaxy Clustering
- Dark Energy Survey Year 6 Results: Redshift Calibration of the Weak Lensing Source Galaxies
- KiDS-1000 cosmic shear reanalysis using MetaCalibration
- Constraining the Stellar-to-Halo Mass Relation with Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing from DES Year 3 Data
- Anisotropic redshift distributions in photometric galaxy clustering and their cosmological impact
Related papers
- Angular clustering and bias of photometric quasars in the Kilo-Degree Survey Data Release 4
- A Novel kinetic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Estimator for Electron-Electron Correlations
- Magnetic fields at the dawn of structure formation I. The CARLA J1510+5958 proto-cluster
- Dark Energy Survey Year 6 Results: Weak Lensing and Galaxy Clustering Cosmological Analysis Framework
- Exploring the Impact of Systematic Bias in Type Ia Supernova Cosmology Across Diverse Dark Energy Parametrizations
- Non-Gaussian Galaxy Stochasticity and the Noise-Field Formulation