The differences in the Narrow Line Region of nearby QSOs 1 and QSOs 2: II - Signatures of kinetic feedback

arXiv:2610.03925 · astro-ph.GA · Submitted 2026-10-02 · Read on arXiv

astro-ph.GA

Submitted: 2026-10-02

Updated: 2026-10-02

Comments: 16 pages, 14 figures, Accepted for publication at MNRAS, October 2026

Project page: https://www.sdss4.org/dr16

License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

The gist: We compare the integrated kinematic properties of the Narrow-Line Region (NLR) of 1500 type 1 and 700 type 2 QSOs at 0.4 < z < 0.5 using emission-line profiles from SDSS-IV spectra.

Abstract

We compare the integrated kinematic properties of the Narrow-Line Region (NLR) of 1500 type 1 and 700 type 2 QSOs at 0.4 < z < 0.5 using emission-line profiles from SDSS-IV spectra. The NLR [OIII] 5007 and Hbeta emission lines are fitted using a two-component model comprising a narrow (v n, sigma n) and a broad component (v b, sigma b), while fainter lines are fitted with a single Gaussian component. Both QSO types exhibit similar median narrow-component velocities (v n 0) and velocity dispersions (sigma < 200 km s-1), consistent with motion driven by the host galaxy's gravitational potential. However, parameters associated with the broad, high-velocity gas component (v b, v 05, v 10, v[NeV], sigma b, W80 and W90) differ: QSOs 1 display larger blueshifts and broader emission lines than QSOs 2. This suggests that these components trace Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN) outflows, that appear stronger in QSOs 1, leading to higher estimated mass-outflow rates (out) and kinetic powers (E out). Rather than offering absolute determinations of out and out -- which remain subject to physical uncertainties -- this statistical study supports the higher NLR excitation found for QSOs 1 in Paper I, as an orientation effect: in QSOs 1, we observe gas closer to the AGN core, where velocities and velocity dispersions are intrinsically higher. Nevertheless, the trend of QSOs 2 exhibiting higher average [OIII] luminosities than QSOs 1 suggests an evolutionary contribution, where QSOs 2 represent an early obscured AGN phase followed by a blowout phase that reveals the central core as a QSO 1.

Sources

Related papers