Suppressing Pressure, Amplifying Evidence: Self-Guided Attention Steering to Mitigate Sycophancy and Stubbornness
cs.AI, cs.CL
Submitted: 2026-10-03
Updated: 2026-10-03
Code: https://github.com/03Grant/sycophancy-and-stubbornness
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: Reliable language models should resist unsupported user pressure while effectively using objective contextual information.
Terminology
Abstract
Reliable language models should resist unsupported user pressure while effectively using objective contextual information. However, models may exhibit sycophancy by yielding to unsupported user pressure or contextual stubbornness by failing to update their answers when relevant contextual information warrants revision. Evaluating interventions for these failures separately can obscure whether mitigating one failure exacerbates the other. To assess this trade-off, we introduce CoPE-Bench with six conditions per question: a neutral baseline, correct or incorrect user pressure, contextual information consistent with or conflicting with the neutral answer, and a joint condition combining incorrect claims with conflicting contextual information. To regulate the influence of user pressure and contextual information, we propose SPAE (Suppressing Pressure, Amplifying Evidence), a training-free framework that uses the model's own judgments to identify relevant tokens, suppressing user pressure and amplifying contextual information through token-level attention steering. On average across five backbones, SPAE reduces pressure following by 18.8 percentage points and increases joint-condition updating by 5.5 percentage points relative to the strongest baseline in the main comparison. In two-turn dialogue, it improves joint-condition updating by an average of 13.2 percentage points over the strongest prompting baseline. The source data and codes can be found at https://github.com/03Grant/sycophancy-and-stubbornness.
Sources
- Measuring Sycophancy of Language Models in Multi-turn Dialogues
- MONICA: Real-Time Monitoring and Calibration of Chain-of-Thought Sycophancy in Large Reasoning Models
- Are You Sure? Challenging LLMs Leads to Performance Drops in The FlipFlop Experiment
- Sycophancy Suppression Can Impair Rational Updating: Anti-Sycophancy Should Preserve the Ability to Update
- Inverse Scaling: When Bigger Isn't Better
- Gemma 4 Technical Report
- Simple synthetic data reduces sycophancy in large language models
- System 2 Attention (is something you might need too)
- Equitable System-Prompt Selection via Constrained Mixed-Strategy GroupDRO
- MIRA: A Bilingual Benchmark for Medical Information Response Audit
- Towards Reliable LLM Evaluation: Correcting the Winner's Curse in Adaptive Benchmarking
- Qwen2.5 Technical Report
- Model Tells Itself Where to Attend: Faithfulness Meets Automatic Attention Steering
Related papers
- MAVEN-T: Reinforced Heterogeneous Distillation for Real-Time Multi-Agent Trajectory Prediction
- Model Discovery Agent: LLM-assisted Bayesian experiment design for data-efficient discovery of mechanistic world models
- Agents' Last Exam
- The Clinician's Veto: Navigating Trust, Liability, and Uncertainty in Autonomous AI Prescribing
- MindHelper: Closed-Loop Embodied Mental-State Reasoning for Precision Intervention
- Incumbent Advantage: Brand Bias and Cognitive Manipulation Dynamics in LLM Recommendation Systems