Angular Baryon Acoustic Oscillations with DESI DR1
astro-ph.CO
Submitted: 2026-10-07
Updated: 2026-10-07
Comments: 42 pages, 13 figures
Code: https://github.com/juanejo95/BAOfit_wtheta
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: We present the angular BAO analysis using DESI DR1 data as a complementary approach to DESI's primary 3D BAO analysis.
Terminology
Abstract
We present the angular BAO analysis using DESI DR1 data as a complementary approach to DESI's primary 3D BAO analysis. We perform the analysis using the two-point angular correlation function w(θ) in tomographic redshift shells of δz = 0.02, 0.05, spanning the redshift range 0.4 < z < 2.1 using the DESI tracers: LRG1, LRG2, LRG3+ELG1, ELG2 and QSO. The main benefit is that it requires no fiducial cosmology to convert redshifts into distances and yields a direct measurement of the transverse dilation parameter α(z). We fit each tracer with a single shared α(z) using templates constructed in a fiducial cosmology and a mock-based covariance from 1000 EZmock realisations. We measure α to 2.5 -- 4.2% precision in each tracer bin. Compared to the D M/r d measurements obtained from the DESI DR1 3D analysis for the same tracers, our results are consistent within the statistical precision. We find no evidence for a shift in the transverse BAO scale between the 2D and 3D analyses. Flat Λ CDM fits to α(z) alone give Ω m = 0.198+0.045-0.068, 1.6σ below the DESI 3D value, and the pull is dominated by the z =1.49 QSO bin, whose α(z=1.49)=1.058 plus or minus0.028 sits about 2σ above the fiducial. Restricting to LRGs and ELGs only, our Ω m and H 0 r d agree with the 3D transverse-only fit over the same bins to better than 0.1σ. With an additional BBN prior, the full 2D sample gives H 0 = 63.9+1.9-3.3, km,s-1,Mpc-1. This pipeline is implementable on forthcoming DESI data releases, where the increase in volume and sampling density will determine if the QSO offset persists and will also tighten 2D BAO constraints.
Sources
- Calibrating the Baryon Oscillation Ruler for Matter and Halos
- Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters
- The WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey: Joint measurements of the expansion and growth history at z < 1
- DESI 2024 III: Baryon Acoustic Oscillations from Galaxies and Quasars
- DESI DR2 Results II: Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and Cosmological Constraints
- Data Release 1 of the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument
- DESI 2024 II: Sample Definitions, Characteristics, and Two-point Clustering Statistics
- The Impact of Wrong Assumptions in BAO Reconstruction
- The Impact of the Fiducial Cosmology Assumption on BAO Cosmological Parameter Inference
- BAO cosmology in non-spatially flat background geometry from BOSS+eBOSS and lessons for future surveys
- Fiducial-Cosmology-dependent systematics for the DESI 2024 BAO Analysis
- Fiducial-Cosmology-dependent systematics for the DESI 2024 Full-Shape Analysis
- Quantification of 2D vs 3D BAO tension using SNIa as a redshift interpolator and test of the Etherington relation
- 2D BAO vs 3D BAO: Hints for new physics?
- Exploring the $H_0$ tension and the evidence of dark sector interaction from 2D BAO measurements
- On the origin of the BAOtr-DESI tension
- 2D BAO vs 3D BAO: solving the Hubble tension with an alternative cosmological model
- Dark Energy Survey: A 2.1% measurement of the angular Baryonic Acoustic Oscillation scale at redshift $z_{\rm eff}$=0.85 from the final dataset
- Measurement of the photometric Baryon Acoustic Oscillations with self-calibrated redshift distribution
- Euclid. I. Overview of the Euclid mission
Related papers
- Angular clustering and bias of photometric quasars in the Kilo-Degree Survey Data Release 4
- A Novel kinetic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Estimator for Electron-Electron Correlations
- Magnetic fields at the dawn of structure formation I. The CARLA J1510+5958 proto-cluster
- Dark Energy Survey Year 6 Results: Weak Lensing and Galaxy Clustering Cosmological Analysis Framework
- Exploring the Impact of Systematic Bias in Type Ia Supernova Cosmology Across Diverse Dark Energy Parametrizations
- Non-Gaussian Galaxy Stochasticity and the Noise-Field Formulation