Avoiding Defects within Heavy-Hexagon Architecture
quant-ph
Submitted: 2026-10-10
Updated: 2026-10-10
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: When implementing scalable fault-tolerant quantum computing using superconducting quantum processors, one of the critical challenges to overcome is the presence of defective qubits arising from
Abstract
When implementing scalable fault-tolerant quantum computing using superconducting quantum processors, one of the critical challenges to overcome is the presence of defective qubits arising from fabrication and calibration imperfections. A defect on a specific qubit severely restricts the connectivity between adjacent qubits, disrupts stabilizer measurements, induces frequent detection events, and consequently inflates the logical error rate. To mitigate this issue, various strategies have been proposed, such as syndrome extraction circuits based on stabilizer folding and the construction of super-stabilizers via gauge operators. However, these methods have primarily been developed for architectures with relatively high connectivity of 3 to 4. Furthermore, experimental demonstrations showing an actual reduction in logical error rates in the presence of physical hardware defects have been lacking. In this work, we propose a defect-avoidance scheme tailored for the heavy-hexagon architecture, which features a lower connectivity of 2 to 3. While previous approaches required four measurement cycles to measure all gauge operators comprising a super-stabilizer, our proposed scheme completes all gauge measurements within only two cycles. We experimentally validate this approach on IBM quantum hardware by identifying physical defects and implementing the defect-avoidance circuits. As a result, avoiding the defect yields an approximately 10% reduction in the logical error rate per cycle for both logical X and Z errors. These findings demonstrate that defects in superconducting hardware can be successfully handled even under the constrained connectivity of heavy-hexagon lattices, and that defect avoidance substantially reduces logical errors on real quantum hardware.
Sources
- Quantum codes on a lattice with boundary
- Demonstrating dynamic surface codes
- Automated Compilation Including Dropouts: Tolerating Defective Components in Stabiliser Codes
- Error correction on an array of superconducting qubits with defective components
- Adaptive Deformation of Color Code in Square Lattices with Defects
- LUCI on IBM Hardware: Error Suppression with Almost Half Syndrome Density
- Excising dead components in the surface code using minimally invasive alterations: A performance study
- Routing-based technique for defect mitigation in quantum error correction
- Defect-Adaptive Lattice Surgery on Irregular Boundary Surface-Code Patches
- Optimized Measurement Schedules for the Surface Code with Dropout
- X-Z Round Scheduling for the Surface Code with Defects under Biased Noise
- Handling fabrication defects in hex-grid surface codes
- IBM Quantum Computers: Evolution, Performance, and Future Directions
- Surface code scaling on heavy-hex superconducting quantum processors
- Low-valency scalable quantum error correction with a dynamic compass code
- Scalable quantum error correction tailored for a heavy-hex qubit array
- The Heisenberg Representation of Quantum Computers
- Surface code off-the-hook: diagonal syndrome-extraction scheduling
- Quantum computer error structure probed by quantum error correction syndrome measurements
- Sparse Blossom: correcting a million errors per core second with minimum-weight matching
Related papers
- Reconquering Bell sampling on qudits: stabilizer learning and testing, quantum pseudorandomness bounds, and more
- Encrypted clones can leak: Classification of informative subsets in Quantum Encrypted Cloning
- Polynomial-time classical and quantum simulation of quantum impurity models
- Incoherent Imaging with Spatially Structured Quantum Probes
- A quasiparticle-protected superconducting qubit
- Theory of quantum-enhanced interferometry with general Markovian light sources