Apertus 1.5: From Open Text Models to Open Multimodal Reasoners
cs.CL
Submitted: 2026-10-11
Updated: 2026-10-11
Code: https://github.com/huggingface/math-verify
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: Language models are becoming infrastructure, and infrastructure built in the open, by public institutions, on documented data, is the alternative to dependence on a few providers; Apertus shows this
Abstract
Language models are becoming infrastructure, and infrastructure built in the open, by public institutions, on documented data, is the alternative to dependence on a few providers; Apertus shows this is viable at scale. Apertus 1.5 extends the fully open Apertus family from text to multimodal reasoning. Continued pretraining of the Apertus 1.0 models, on 4T additional tokens for the 8B and 2T for the 70B, adds image and audio understanding and extends the context window fourfold to 262,144 tokens; multimodality enters through the tokenizer, the language-model head remains restricted to text, and the architecture is unchanged. Supervised finetuning, long-context finetuning, reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards, and preference alignment complete the released models. Thinking is a flag of the chat template rather than a separate model, and lifts mathematical reasoning by up to 20 points on the 8B model. The released models improve over their predecessors on nearly every benchmark; among fully open models of its class, the 8B leads on knowledge, instruction following, and cultural benchmarks, and its instruction following surpasses all compared models, including open-weight ones. On image and audio understanding, a first for the family, the models are competitive with fully open multimodal models, strongest on document understanding and long-form and lower-resource speech recognition, while specialized vision and audio models remain ahead on perception and transcription of English and other high-resource languages. As in Apertus 1.0, we train only on openly available data, respect crawler opt-outs retroactively, and exclude restrictively licensed material. We release the model weights, data preparation and training recipes, and evaluation suites under permissive licenses; openness extends to values, with the Apertus charter guiding alignment stages published alongside the models.
Sources
- Big-Math: A Large-Scale, High-Quality Math Dataset for Reinforcement Learning in Language Models
- LLaVA-OneVision-1.5: Fully Open Framework for Democratized Multimodal Training
- Program Synthesis with Large Language Models
- Llama-Nemotron: Efficient Reasoning Models
- Holistic Evaluation of Multimodal LLMs on Spatial Intelligence
- Chameleon: Mixed-Modal Early-Fusion Foundation Models
- Qwen2-Audio Technical Report
- Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challenge
- Emu3.5: Native Multimodal Models are World Learners
- Gemma 4 Technical Report
- AILuminate: Introducing v1.0 of the AI Risk and Reliability Benchmark from MLCommons
- The Llama 3 Herd of Models
- Direct Language Model Alignment from Online AI Feedback
- PathVQA: 30000+ Questions for Medical Visual Question Answering
- Multi-IF: Benchmarking LLMs on Multi-Turn and Multilingual Instructions Following
- Qwen3-TTS Technical Report
- Deriving Activation Functions Using Integration
- K2-V2: A 360-Open, Reasoning-Enhanced LLM
- RSRCC: A Remote Sensing Regional Change Comprehension Benchmark Constructed via Retrieval-Augmented Best-of-N Ranking
- CTRL: A Conditional Transformer Language Model for Controllable Generation
Related papers
- Exploring Solution Divergence and Its Effect on Large Language Model Problem Solving
- Ishigaki-IDS-Bench: A Benchmark for Generating Information Delivery Specification from BIM Information Requirements
- Subliminal Steering: Stronger Encoding of Hidden Signals
- MedStruct-S: A Benchmark for Key Discovery, Key-Conditioned QA and Semi-Structured Extraction from OCR Clinical Reports
- The End of Transformers? On Challenging Attention and the Rise of Sub-Quadratic Architectures
- Untangling the Mechanisms of Misleading Context in Medical Question Answering