What Does 2D Coronal Seismology Measure?

arXiv:2610.17433 · astro-ph.SR · Submitted 2026-10-12 · Read on arXiv

astro-ph.SR

Submitted: 2026-10-12

Updated: 2026-10-12

Comments: 29 pages, 14 figures, accepted by ApJ

License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

The gist: Two-dimensional (2D) coronal seismology based on coronagraphic imaging spectroscopy has emerged as a promising method for mapping the coronal magnetic field, but the physical meaning of its inferred

Abstract

Two-dimensional (2D) coronal seismology based on coronagraphic imaging spectroscopy has emerged as a promising method for mapping the coronal magnetic field, but the physical meaning of its inferred quantities under optically thin line-of-sight (LOS) integration remains uncertain. We investigate this problem by synthesizing coronagraphic observables from a global wave-driven magnetohydrodynamic model with a long LOS extent and a structured corona, and by applying the same analysis procedures used for observations. We compare the diagnosed density, wave propagation direction, phase speed, and magnetic-field strength with different LOS-weighted reference quantities from the model. We find that the measured density and the wave propagation direction are both well represented by LOS emissivity-weighted quantities. In contrast, the phase speed is not controlled by emissivity weighting alone: the LOS distribution of wave velocity amplitude also plays an important role. As a result, the inferred magnetic field is better represented by combining the emissivity-weighted density with an amplitude-dependent effective speed. Emissivity weighting nevertheless remains a reasonable approximation, and a useful baseline, over much of the field of view, especially where the LOS does not cross strongly structured plasma-sheet-like regions. These results clarify the physical interpretation of 2D coronal seismology and provide guidance for future coronal magnetic-field tomography and model-constrained applications.

Related papers