Grid or Nodes? Probing Object Memory in World Models Under Partial Observability

arXiv:2610.18637 · cs.RO, cs.CV, cs.LG · Submitted 2026-10-13 · Read on arXiv

cs.RO, cs.CV, cs.LG

Submitted: 2026-10-13

Updated: 2026-10-13

License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

The gist: A robot's world model must remember objects that leave the camera's view.

Terminology

Abstract

A robot's world model must remember objects that leave the camera's view. FloWM, a learned world model, keeps them in a spatial grid of features that it moves with five built-in velocities. A node memory instead keeps each object's position and velocity as numbers. We compare them in FloWM's own block world, with an oracle-fed Kalman tracker as the node memory. How the grid is read changes its score: a single-cell probe finds 66% of out-of-view blocks, while FloWM's own probe 89%. FloWM also scores 8 points higher in view although no frame is shown, which we attribute to its write-back of its own predictions. Out of view, the tracker reaches FloWM's range in 14KB against 5.6MB, with no probe. On diagonal motion, outside its five velocities, FloWM finds 11% of blocks even after fine-tuning, while the unchanged tracker keeps 93%. Faster blocks defeat both until one more allowed speed takes the tracker to 94%, where FloWM's built-in shifts would need 25 copies of its grid. A learned node memory must still replace the oracles and handle velocity under noise, long gaps, and the bounce.

Sources

Related papers