OmniCompass: A Holistic Benchmark for Omni-Modal Video Grounding and Understanding
cs.CV, cs.CL, cs.MM
Submitted: 2026-10-13
Updated: 2026-10-13
Comments: Homepage: https://omnicompass.netlify.app/
Project page: https://omnicompass.netlify.app
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: With the rapid development of multimodal large language models (MLLMs), evaluating their video understanding capabilities has become increasingly important.
Terminology
Abstract
With the rapid development of multimodal large language models (MLLMs), evaluating their video understanding capabilities has become increasingly important. Existing video understanding benchmarks cover only part of the evaluation dimensions, limiting systematic diagnosis of omni-modal video understanding. We introduce OmniCompass, a holistic benchmark for omni-modal video grounding and understanding. OmniCompass defines two evaluation tracks: OmniCompass-VL assesses vision-language models on tasks requiring visual evidence, while OmniCompass-AV assesses omni-modal models on tasks requiring joint audio-visual evidence. Each track includes three complementary tasks: temporal grounding (TG), spatial grounding (SG), and question answering (QA), assessing when a referenced target appears, where it is, and what happens. QA covers five perception and three reasoning categories in OmniCompass-VL, and three perception and two reasoning categories in OmniCompass-AV. OmniCompass-VL contains 820 videos and 2,460 instances across domains and three duration types: short, medium, and long. A narrative- and audio-rich subset forms OmniCompass-AV with 240 videos and 720 instances. Each instance is evaluated under two paired settings: text-only and text+image, specifying the same target through text and visual-language guidance. All instances are manually annotated with multi-round quality verification. Evaluations of 50 MLLMs show that open-source models still lag behind proprietary counterparts, particularly in audio-visual understanding. Precise temporal and spatial grounding remains challenging even for leading models, and their predictions still exhibit inconsistencies across the paired target specifications.
Sources
- LLaVA-OneVision-2: Towards Next-Generation Perceptual Intelligence
- Qwen3-VL Technical Report
- OmniReasoner: Thinking with Long Audio-Video via Native Tool Use
- How Far Are We to GPT-4V? Closing the Gap to Commercial Multimodal Models with Open-Source Suites
- VideoLLaMA 2: Advancing Spatial-Temporal Modeling and Audio Understanding in Video-LLMs
- MiniCPM-o 4.5: Towards Real-Time Full-Duplex Omni-Modal Interaction
- Video-MME-v2: Towards the Next Stage in Benchmarks for Comprehensive Video Understanding
- Kimi K3: Open Frontier Intelligence
- LLaVA-OneVision: Easy Visual Task Transfer
- Ola: Pushing the Frontiers of Omni-Modal Language Model
- Seed2.0 Model Card: Towards Intelligence Frontier for Real-World Complexity
- video-SALMONN 2: Caption-Enhanced Audio-Visual Large Language Models
- OneVision-Encoder: Codec-Aligned Sparsity as a Foundational Principle for Multimodal Intelligence
- Kwai Keye-VL-2.0 Technical Report
- Qwen3.5-Omni Technical Report
- InternVL3.5: Advancing Open-Source Multimodal Models in Versatility, Reasoning, and Efficiency
- Qwen2.5-Omni Technical Report
- Qwen3-Omni Technical Report
- ParaVT: Taming the Tool Prior Paradox for Parallel Tool Use in Agentic Video Reinforcement Learning
- GLM-5: from Vibe Coding to Agentic Engineering
Related papers
- Loss Knows Best: Detecting Annotation Errors in Videos via Loss Trajectories
- AnchorWeave: World-Consistent Video Generation with Retrieved Local Spatial Memories
- Benchmarking the Robustness of Foundation Models for Mammography under Domain Shift
- MambaX-Net: Dual-Input Mamba-Enhanced Cross-Attention Network for Longitudinal MRI Segmentation
- TeleOCR: Navigating Document Parsing Across Digital and Camera-Captured Documents
- A Survey on Efficient Vision-Language-Action Models